Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Polyacrylamide coated Milorganite™ and gypsum for controlling sediment and phosphorus loads

Contents:

Author Info

  • Mailapalli, Damodhara R.
  • Thompson, Anita M.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The application of polymer for controlling erosion and the associated nutrient transport has been well documented. However, comparatively less information is available on the effect of polymer application together with soil amendments. In this study, the effect of polyacrylamide (PAM) in combination with surface application of gypsum and Milorganite™ (MILwaukee ORGAnic NITtrogEn) biosolid for reducing sediment and phosphorus transport under laboratory rainfall simulations was investigated. The treatments considered were bare soil, gypsum, Milorganite™, gypsum+Milorganite™, PAM-coated gypsum and PAM-coated Milorganite™. Application rates for gypsum and Milorganite™ were 392kgha−1 (350lb/acre) and 726kgha−1 (650lb/acre), respectively. The PAM was coated on gypsum and Milorganite™ at an application rate of 11.2kgha−1 (10lb/acre) and 22.4kgha−1 (20lb/acre), respectively. Rain simulation experiments were conducted using a rainfall intensity of 6.0cmh−1 for 1h on a 10% slope. Surface runoff was collected continuously from each soil box over 10min intervals and leachate was collected continuously over the 60min simulation. The reduction in runoff or in leachate for all treatments was not significantly different from the bare soil control. The sediment loss for PAM coated Milorganite™ was reduced by 77%, when compared to bare soil. However, the sediment loss was not significantly reduced for any other treatment compared to bare soil. The PAM-coated gypsum was not effective for erosion control in our study, and there appears to be a correlation between effectiveness and prill size. However, the gypsum (coated and uncoated) contributed about half of the dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) export (in the runoff) compared to bare soil. The PAM-coated Milorgante™ reduced the DRP and total phosphorus (TP) export to 0.3–0.5 times that of Milorganite™ and to levels similar to bare soil. The decreased sediment and phosphorus export for the PAM-coated Milorganite™ treatment is a signal for a potential management practice for controlling erosion and nutrient transport in fertilized agricultural landscapes.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377411002289
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Agricultural Water Management.

    Volume (Year): 101 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 27-34

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:27-34

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat

    Related research

    Keywords: Biosolids; Milorganite™; Gypsum; Polyacrylamide; Runoff; Sediment; Phosphorous;

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. David Pimentel, 2006. "Soil Erosion: A Food and Environmental Threat," Environment, Development and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 119-137, 02.
    2. Mailapalli, Damodhara R. & Wallender, Wesley W. & Burger, Martin & Horwath, William R., 2010. "Effects of field length and management practices on dissolved organic carbon export in furrow irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 29-37, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:27-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.