IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/advacc/v31y2015i1p91-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor scrutiny of unaudited client disclosure outlets: Recognized vs. disclosed financial statement items also appearing in the MD&A

Author

Listed:
  • Wheeler, Stephen
  • Cereola, Sandra J.

Abstract

Securities and Exchange Commission standards require disclosure of material non-recurring or unusual items affecting earnings in the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section of annual 10Ks. Extraordinary items and LIFO liquidations represent unusual and non-recurring items. When material, both issues theoretically should be highlighted in management's discussion of current operations in the MD&A. Extraordinary items are recognized on the face of the income statement, while LIFO liquidations are disclosed in the footnotes. Libby, Nelson, and Hunton (2006) found that auditors permit more misstatement in disclosed, as opposed to recognized, amounts in annual reports. In this paper we test empirically whether these audit tendencies also apply in secondary disclosure venues such as the MD&A. For public companies reporting between 2001 and 2011, significantly higher MD&A disclosure rates are noted for recognized items, as opposed to disclosed items. Also, contrary to what Attribution Theory would predict, our results did not show a significant tendency to disclose negative-income-effect extraordinary items more often in the MD&A.

Suggested Citation

  • Wheeler, Stephen & Cereola, Sandra J., 2015. "Auditor scrutiny of unaudited client disclosure outlets: Recognized vs. disclosed financial statement items also appearing in the MD&A," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 91-95.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:advacc:v:31:y:2015:i:1:p:91-95
    DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611015000103
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaplan, Steven E. & Reckers, Philip M. J. & Roark, Stephen J., 1988. "An attribution theory analysis of tax evasion related judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 371-379, June.
    2. Robert Libby & Mark W. Nelson & James E. Hunton, 2006. "Retracted: Recognition v. Disclosure, Auditor Tolerance for Misstatement, and the Reliability of Stock‐Compensation and Lease Information," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 533-560, June.
    3. Birnberg, Jacob G. & Frieze, Irene Hanson & Shields, Michael D., 1977. "The role of attribution theory in control systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 189-200, June.
    4. Arrington, Ce & Bailey, Cd & Hopwood, Ws, 1985. "An Attribution Analysis Of Responsibility Assessment For Audit Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 1-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Mittone, 2002. "Individual styles of tax evasion: an experimental study," CEEL Working Papers 0202, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    2. Kothari, S.P. & Ramanna, Karthik & Skinner, Douglas J., 2010. "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 246-286, December.
    3. Blanthorne, Cindy & Kaplan, Steven, 2008. "An egocentric model of the relations among the opportunity to underreport, social norms, ethical beliefs, and underreporting behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 684-703.
    4. Fried, Abraham N. & Davis-Friday, Paquita Y., 2013. "Economic consequences of mandatory GAAP changes: The case of SFAS No. 158," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 186-194.
    5. Hartmann, Frank & Slapnicar, Sergeja, 2009. "How formal performance evaluation affects trust between superior and subordinate managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 722-737, August.
    6. Ling Chu & Robert Mathieu & Chima Mbagwu, 2013. "Audit Quality and Banks' Assessment of Disclosed Accounting Information," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 719-738, December.
    7. Arnold, Markus C. & Artz, Martin, 2015. "Target difficulty, target flexibility, and firm performance: Evidence from business units’ targets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 61-77.
    8. Mittone, Luigi, 2006. "Dynamic behaviour in tax evasion: An experimental approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 813-835, October.
    9. Elisabetta Barone & Jacqueline Birt & Soledad Moya, 2014. "Lease Accounting: A Review of Recent Literature," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 35-54, June.
    10. Alderman, Jillian, 2017. "Does auditor gender influence auditor liability? Exploring the impact of the crime congruency effect on jurors' perceptions of auditor negligence," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 75-87.
    11. Norman, Carolyn Strand & Rose, Jacob M. & Suh, Ik Seon, 2011. "The effects of disclosure type and audit committee expertise on Chief Audit Executives' tolerance for financial misstatements," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 102-108, February.
    12. Emna Ben Saad & Cédric Lesage, 2009. "Perception De L'Indépendance De L'Auditeur : Analyse Par La Théorie D'Attribution," Post-Print halshs-00460618, HAL.
    13. Gaynor, Lisa Milici & McDaniel, Linda & Yohn, Teri Lombardi, 2011. "Fair value accounting for liabilities: The role of disclosures in unraveling the counterintuitive income statement effect from credit risk changes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 125-134, April.
    14. Krische, Susan D. & Sanders, Paula R. & Smith, Steven D., 2012. "Lease transaction structuring, earnings management, and management credibility," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 33-39.
    15. Pascu Ana-Maria, 2013. "Study on Quality in the Accounting Profession in General, and in Audit, in particular, through the Perspective of Taking Responsibility," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(32), pages 108-123, May.
    16. Blacconiere, Walter G. & Frederickson, James R. & Johnson, Marilyn F. & Lewis, Melissa F., 2011. "Are voluntary disclosures that disavow the reliability of mandated fair value information informative or opportunistic?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 235-251.
    17. Nouri, Hossein & Kyj, Larissa, 2008. "The effect of performance feedback on prior budgetary participative research using survey methodology: An empirical study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1431-1453.
    18. MirHadi Hosseini Kondelaji & Majid Sameti & Hadi Amiri & Rozita Moayedfar, 2016. "Analyzing Determinants of Tax Morale Based on Social Psychology Theory: Case Study of Iran," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 20(4), pages 579-595, Autumn.
    19. Mitchell Bryce & Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Paul R. Mather, 2021. "Director expectations gap and hindsight bias," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2965-2996, June.
    20. Radcliffe, Vaughan S. & Spence, Crawford & Stein, Mitchell & Wilkinson, Brett, 2018. "Professional repositioning during times of institutional change: The case of tax practitioners and changing moral boundaries," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 45-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:advacc:v:31:y:2015:i:1:p:91-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/advances-in-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.