IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00460618.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perception De L'Indépendance De L'Auditeur : Analyse Par La Théorie D'Attribution

Author

Listed:
  • Emna Ben Saad

    (HEC Paris - Recherche - Hors Laboratoire - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales)

  • Cédric Lesage

    (HEC Paris - Recherche - Hors Laboratoire - HEC Paris - Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales)

Abstract

"Where was the auditor?" is one of the first questions asked by most investors when they suffer significant losses. We study this almost systematic behavior of shareholders when they appreciate the auditor's independence into the attribution theory framework. The difference between the actual and the perceived independence is related to the expectation gap concept. We hypothesize that the expectation gap could be related to an attribution phenomenon. In a laboratory experiment setting, we ask 86 MBA students (acting as shareholders) to assess the auditor's or auditee's responsibility in a case of accounting fraud. We manipulate the internal attribution factors of the auditor and the auditee. Our results show that the attribution phenomenon explains the blame of the auditor only in cases where auditor and auditee are both involved. Additional results are disclosed and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Emna Ben Saad & Cédric Lesage, 2009. "Perception De L'Indépendance De L'Auditeur : Analyse Par La Théorie D'Attribution," Post-Print halshs-00460618, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00460618
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00460618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00460618/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilcox, Kirkland A. & Smith, Charles H., 1977. "Role discrepancies and the auditor-client relationship," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 81-97, January.
    2. Bent Warming-Rasmussen & Lars Jensen, 1998. "Quality dimensions in external audit services- an external user perspective," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 65-82.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2426 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Jere R. Francis, 2006. "Are Auditors Compromised by Nonaudit Services? Assessing the Evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 747-760, September.
    5. Marianne Jennings & Dan C. Kneer & Philip M. J. Reckers, 1993. "The Significance of Audit Decision Aids and Precase Jurists' Attitudes on Perceptions of Audit Firm Culpability and Liability," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 489-507, March.
    6. Chrystelle Richard, 2006. "Why an auditor can't be competent and independent: a French case study," Post-Print halshs-00153454, HAL.
    7. F. Todd Dezoort & Richard W. Houston & Michael F. Peters, 2001. "The Impact of Internal Auditor Compensation and Role on External Auditors' Planning Judgments and Decisions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 257-281, June.
    8. Chrystelle Richard, 2006. "Why an auditor can't be competent and independent: A french case study," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 153-179.
    9. Nicholas Dopuch & Ronald R. King & Rachel Schwartz, 2003. "Independence in Appearance and in Fact: An Experimental Investigation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 79-114, March.
    10. McNair, C. J., 1991. "Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 635-653.
    11. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    12. Arrington, Ce & Bailey, Cd & Hopwood, Ws, 1985. "An Attribution Analysis Of Responsibility Assessment For Audit Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 1-20.
    13. Antle, R & Nalebuff, B, 1991. "Conservatism And Auditor-Client Negotiations," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29, pages 31-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie Audousset-Coulier, 2009. "L'utilisation des honoraires d'audit pour mesurer la qualité de l'audit : théorie et évidence," Post-Print halshs-00460230, HAL.
    2. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Patrick Ifergan, 2011. "Interprétativisme et complexité des normes d'audit françaises," Post-Print hal-00650464, HAL.
    4. Jean-Noël Chauvey & Maxime José Chanhoun & Sena John Ahyee, 2017. "Quality of public organization auditing arrangement and control in Benin [Qualité de l'audit comptable et financier et du contrôle des structures publiques du Bénin]," Post-Print hal-01907571, HAL.
    5. Kohler, Hervé & Pochet, Christine & Gendron, Yves, 2021. "Networks of interpretation: An ethnography of the quest for IFRS consistency in a global accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Laurence Daoust & Bertrand Malsch, 2020. "When the Client Is A Former Auditor: Auditees' Expert Knowledge and Social Capital as Threats to Staff Auditors' Operational Independence†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1333-1369, September.
    7. González-Díaz, Belén & García-Fernández, Roberto & López-Díaz, Antonio, 2015. "Auditor tenure and audit quality in Spanish state-owned foundations," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 115-126.
    8. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:51-73 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Espinosa Díaz, Yuli Samary & Revelo Mantilla, Jessica Tatiana & Ballesteros Sarabia, Victor Manuel, 2020. "Nociones del escepticismo profesional del Contador Público en ejercicio de las auditorías: una perspectiva teórica," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 21(2), pages 266-282, July.
    10. Olivier Herrbach, 2001. "Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 787-802.
    11. Rick Antle & Elizabeth Gordon & Ganapathi Narayanamoorthy & Ling Zhou, 2002. "The Joint Determination of Audit Fees, Non-Audit Fees, and Abnormal Accruals," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2502, Yale School of Management, revised 02 May 2006.
    12. Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2020. "A pragmatist approach to audit practices: two cases of technical dialog from nuclear risk governance in France," Post-Print halshs-03721410, HAL.
    13. van Lent, L.A.G.M., 1999. "Incomplete contracting theory in empirical accounting research," Other publications TiSEM 088f797d-9fa4-4081-98f4-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Lambert Jerman & Julien Raone, 2014. "Dompter La Verite Dans L'Organisation : La Subjectivation Comme Production De L'Animal Confessant," Post-Print hal-01899765, HAL.
    15. Der-Fen Huang & Ming-Lei Chang, 2016. "Do auditor-provided tax services improve the relation between tax-related internal control and book-tax differences?," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 177-199, June.
    16. Dilek Kaçmaz & Ahmet Türel, 2021. "Audit Quality and Rotation: Perception in Turkey," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(91), pages 109-122, December.
    17. Svanberg, Jan & Öhman, Peter, 2015. "Auditors' identification with their clients: Effects on audit quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 395-408.
    18. Anastasia Kraft & Kerstin Lopatta, 2016. "Auditor fees, discretionary book-tax differences, and tax avoidance," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 127-155.
    19. Steven Lustgarten & John Shon, 2013. "Do abnormal accruals affect the life expectancy of audit engagements?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 443-466, April.
    20. Alan Kilgore & Renee Radich & Graeme Harrison, 2011. "The Relative Importance of Audit Quality Attributes," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(3), pages 253-265, September.
    21. Pernilla Broberg & Torbjörn Tagesson & Daniela Argento & Niclas Gyllengahm & Ola Mårtensson, 2017. "Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 331-350, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00460618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.