IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cys/ecocyb/v50y2016i3p117-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multi-Criteria Fractional Transportation Problem With Fuzzy "Bottleneck" Condition

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra TKACENKO

    (The State University of Moldova)

Abstract

The paper proposes a new approach to the multi-criteria fractional transportation problem with the same bottleneck denominators, additionally criterion for is also time constraint, i.e. the type bottleneck. We propose to study the case when the bottleneck criterion is not deterministic, but of fuzzy type. In this paper I propose an iterative algorithm for solving the model. It generates the crowds efficient model solutions for different types of approaches to the time required for transport from optimistic to pessimistic, using for this purpose the possible ranges of variation thereof. The algorithm was tested on several examples and was found to be quite effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra TKACENKO, 2016. "The Multi-Criteria Fractional Transportation Problem With Fuzzy "Bottleneck" Condition," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 50(3), pages 117-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2016:i:3:p:117-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://www.eadr.ro/RePEc/cys/ecocyb_pdf/ecocyb3_2016p117-134.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Y. P. Aneja & K. P. K. Nair, 1979. "Bicriteria Transportation Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 73-78, January.
    3. Das, S. K. & Goswami, A. & Alam, S. S., 1999. "Multiobjective transportation problem with interval cost, source and destination parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 100-112, August.
    4. Abd El-Wahed, Waiel F. & Lee, Sang M., 2006. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming for multi-objective transportation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-166, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. K. Bharati & Rita Malhotra, 2017. "Two stage intuitionistic fuzzy time minimizing transportation problem based on generalized Zadeh’s extension principle," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1442-1449, November.
    2. S. Dutta & S. Acharya & Rajashree Mishra, 2016. "Genetic algorithm based fuzzy stochastic transportation programming problem with continuous random variables," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 835-872, December.
    3. Wong, Bo K. & Lai, Vincent S., 2011. "A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998-2009," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 157-168, January.
    4. Sujeet Kumar Singh & Shiv Prasad Yadav, 2018. "Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-objective linear programming problem with various membership functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 693-707, October.
    5. Shalabh Singh & Sonia Singh, 2022. "Shipment in a multi-choice environment: a case study of shipping carriers in US," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1195-1219, December.
    6. Tien-Fu Liang, 2012. "Integrated manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multiple imprecise goals in an uncertain environment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-153, January.
    7. Heydar Ali Mardani-Fard & Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh & Ali Mahmoodirad & Sadegh Niroomand, 2020. "An effective hybrid goal programming approach for multi-objective straight assembly line balancing problem with stochastic parameters," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1939-1976, December.
    8. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Carla Oliveira Henriques & Dulce Helena Coelho & Maria Elisabete Duarte Neves, 2022. "Investment planning in energy efficiency programs: a portfolio based approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 615-649, March.
    10. Shubham Gupta & Raghav Khanna & Pranay Kohli & Sarthak Agnihotri & Umang Soni & M. Asjad, 2023. "Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure using Fuzzy AHP – a case study in India," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 245-258, March.
    11. Berna Tektas Sivrikaya & Ferhan Cebi & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Dursun Delen, 2017. "A fuzzy long-term investment planning model for a GenCo in a hybrid electricity market considering climate change impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 975-991, October.
    12. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    13. Kim, Jong Soon & Whang, Kyu-Seung, 1998. "A tolerance approach to the fuzzy goal programming problems with unbalanced triangular membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 614-624, June.
    14. Berna Tektaş & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Ferhan Çebi & Dursun Delen, 2022. "A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Jafar Rezaei & Negin Salimi, 2015. "Optimal ABC inventory classification using interval programming," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(11), pages 1944-1952, August.
    16. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    17. Víctor G. Alfaro-García & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Gerardo G. Alfaro Calderón, 2017. "A fuzzy approach to a municipality grouping model towards creation of synergies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 391-408, September.
    18. Aghayi, Nazila & Maleki, Bentolhoda, 2016. "Efficiency measurement of DMUs with undesirable outputs under uncertainty based on the directional distance function: Application on bank industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 376-387.
    19. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    20. de Andres-Sanchez, Jorge, 2007. "Claim reserving with fuzzy regression and Taylor's geometric separation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 145-163, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fuzzy programming; fractional multi-criteria transportation model; “bottleneck” criterion; efficient solution; coefficient of optimism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C29 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Other
    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2016:i:3:p:117-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.