IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000549/019357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencia de la religiosidad, la norma subjetiva y la efectividad percibida del consumidor en el consumo socialmente responsable

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Camilo Mejía
  • Rafael Currás-Pérez
  • Carlos Manuel Córdoba-Segovia

Abstract

Esta investigación analizó la relación entre religiosidad, norma subjetiva y efectividad percibida del consumidor en la intención de compra de productos socialmente responsables. La investigación empírica se basó en un cuestionario repartido, en igual proporción, a 485 personas ubicadas en Colombia y Espana. Para su evaluación se realizó un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales a partir de la técnica Partial Least Square (PLS). Se encontró similitud en los resultados entre ambos países, comprobándose, en los dos casos, la influencia de la religiosidad sobre las dimensiones de consumo responsable. También se pudo determinar la importancia de la norma subjetiva sobre este tipo de consumo. Sin embargo, no fue posible comprobar la hipótesis que relacionaba la efectividad percibida por el consumidor en este tipo de compras. Con estos resultados se concluyó acerca de la importancia del papel de la religiosidad en las intenciones de consumo responsable, debido, principalmente, a su función simbólica y socializadora como elemento de aculturación y de expresión de identidad. Asimismo, fue posible ampliar la teoría del comportamiento planificado al explorar la norma subjetiva en este tipo de compras. El estudio sugirió investigaciones sobre consumo responsable y sus factores influyentes, y propuso estrategias de marketing para fortalecerlo en favor del medio ambiente, la sociedad y la economía de las organizaciones.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Camilo Mejía & Rafael Currás-Pérez & Carlos Manuel Córdoba-Segovia, 2021. "Influencia de la religiosidad, la norma subjetiva y la efectividad percibida del consumidor en el consumo socialmente responsable," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 7(14), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000549:019357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1809
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Metin Cosgel & Lanse Minkler, 2004. "Religious Identity and Consumption," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 339-350.
    2. Sood, James & Nasu, Yukio, 1995. "Religiosity and nationality : An exploratory study of their effect on consumer behavior in Japan and the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Raymond J. Jones & Timothy M. Reilly & Marcus Z. Cox & Brooklyn M. Cole, 2017. "Gender Makes a Difference: Investigating Consumer Purchasing Behavior and Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility Policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 133-144, March.
    4. Mohd Danish Kirmani & Mohammed Naved Khan, 2016. "Environmental attributes and market segmentation: insights from India," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 73-92.
    5. Webb, Deborah J. & Mohr, Lois A. & Harris, Katherine E., 2008. "A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 91-98, February.
    6. Hamza Khraim, 2010. "Measuring Religiosity in Consumer Research From an Islamic Perspective," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 52-78, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Currás‐Pérez & Consuelo Dolz‐Dolz & María J. Miquel‐Romero & Isabel Sánchez‐García, 2018. "How social, environmental, and economic CSR affects consumer‐perceived value: Does perceived consumer effectiveness make a difference?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 733-747, September.
    2. Esa Mangeloja, 2004. "Interrelationship of economic growth and regional religious properties," ERSA conference papers ersa04p94, European Regional Science Association.
    3. María Del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach, 2019. "Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross‐national analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 238-247, January.
    4. Tamaki Kitagawa & Kenichi Kashiwagi & Hiroko Isoda, 2020. "Effect of Religious and Cultural Information of Olive Oil on Consumer Behavior: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Silhouette-Dercourt, Virginie & de Lassus, Christel & Darpy, Denis, 2014. "How second-generation consumers choose where to shop: A cross-cultural semiotic analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1059-1067.
    6. Mubariz Mammadli, 2022. "Environmentally Responsible Business Approaches in Azerbaijan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Carmen Berné-Manero & Marta Pedraja-Iglesias & Pilar Ramo-Sáez, 2017. "Socially responsible markets involved in the consumer-organization identification process," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(2), pages 179-196, June.
    8. Ilisa Fajriyati & Adi Zakaria Afiff & Gita Gayatri & Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati, 2022. "Attributes Influencing Overall Tourist Satisfaction and Its Consequences for Muslim-Majority Destination," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    9. Nikolaos Satsios & Spyros Hadjidakis & Ioannis Sotiropoulos & Nicholas Tsounis, 2020. "Religiosity and Intention towards Saving of a Muslim Minority in Greece," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Nor Khasimah Aliman & Zailin Zainal Ariffin & Shareena Mohamed Hashim, 2018. "Religiosity Commitment and Decision-Making Styles Among Generation Y Muslim Consumers in Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 554-576, January.
    11. Muhammad Abdullah Khan & Usman Ghani & Sadia Aziz, 2019. "Impact of Islamic Religiosity on Consumers’ Attitudes towards Islamic and Conventional ways of Advertisements, Attitude towards Brands and Purchase Intentions," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, March.
    12. Johari Bin Abdullah & Firdaus Abdullah & Saimi Bin Bujang, 2023. "Conceptualizing Muslim Consumer Religiosity: Challenges and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(1), pages 114-120.
    13. Frame, Bob & Brown, Judy, 2008. "Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 225-241, April.
    14. Daniel Belanche & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2021. "The role of customers in the gig economy: how perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(1), pages 45-75, March.
    15. Gheorghe Epura & Bianca Tesca?iu & Raluca Dania Todor & Karin-Andreea Sasu, 2017. "Responsible Consumption – Source of Competitive Advantages and Solution for Tourist Protection," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 447-447, May.
    16. Ragna Nilssen & Geoff Bick & Russell Abratt, 2019. "Comparing the relative importance of sustainability as a consumer purchase criterion of food and clothing in the retail sector," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 71-83, January.
    17. Petra Šánová & Jitka Svobodová & Adriana Laputková, 2017. "Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis to Evaluate Selected Aspects of Behaviour of Consumers Purchasing Local Food Products," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(6), pages 2083-2093.
    18. Michael Carr & Aurelie Charles & Wilfred Dolfsma & Robert McMaster & Tonia Warnecke, 2015. "Effective Contributions to the Review of Social Economy and Social Economics—Editorial," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(2), pages 139-145, June.
    19. Magdalena Öberseder & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Patrick Murphy & Verena Gruber, 2014. "Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 101-115, September.
    20. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya & Sumi Jha & Dinesh Sharma, 2020. "Development of a Scale on Individual Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility Constructs: Based on Microfoundation Theory," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 47-59, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    estructura del mercado; comportamiento del mercado; efectividad percibida del consumidor; norma subjetiva;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • L10 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - General
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000549:019357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feitmco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.