IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v68y2015i10p03-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industry 4.0: The Digital Economy – Challenges and Opportunities for Businesses and the Working World

Author

Listed:
  • Irene Bertschek
  • Reiner Clement
  • Daniel Buhr
  • Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen
  • Oliver Falck
  • Alexandra Heimisch
  • Anita Jacob-Puchalska
  • Andreas Mazat

Abstract

Since the mid-1990s, new information and communication technologies have been used to an increasing extent and with growing importance in the world of work. Increased digitisation has changed both the economy and society. Some even call this a "fourth industrial revolution", because traditional business models are being called into question. What is the impact of this development? Irene Bertschek, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, and Mannheim University, sees the merger of ICT and production, and thus the ICT sector and the manufacturing sector, as an opportunity for Germany to take a pioneering role in the digital competition. The digitisation of the world of work also offers companies the chance, through individual working time models, to strengthen professionals' ties to the company and to allow staff to achieve a better balance between work and private life. However, both companies and their workers face the challenge of using this flexibility efficiently and responsibly. Exploiting the potential of digitisation depends largely on complementary investments in organisational capital and in human capital. Reiner Clement, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, discusses crowdsourcing. This concept involves outsourcing a task to an indeterminate or unknown group, usually through an Internet platform. The aim is an interactive form of service delivery. Crowdsourcing has a number of opportunities and risks. A positive aspect is that crowdsourcing enables enterprises to access a pool of labour and knowledge that exceed the own capacities. A critical aspect is the negative impact on the labour market if the prices for paid employment fall. For Daniel Buhr, University of Tübingen, Industry 4.0 is much more than technology: it is important to understand Industry 4.0 as an interaction between technical and social innovations. This is the only way to ensure that as many as possible benefit from the opportunities, and not only a small part of society. Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen, Technische Universität Dortmund, is convinced that planning and management will also feel the longer lasting effects of the introduction of Industry-4.0 systems. At the operational level, a number of studies suggest that digital technologies automate and thus substitute simple tasks – with the new technologies there will be a connecting and a general "upgrading" of jobs and skills. Oliver Falck, Alexandra Native, Anita Jacob Puchalska and Andreas Mazat, Ifo Institute, anticipate positive impulses, in general, but they also argue that computerisation and automation, and thus also their linkage to Industry 4.0, will pose potential threats to parts of the labour market, so that the employment effects associated with the structural changes will place high demands on labour market flexibility in order that all sectors of society can share in technological progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene Bertschek & Reiner Clement & Daniel Buhr & Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen & Oliver Falck & Alexandra Heimisch & Anita Jacob-Puchalska & Andreas Mazat, 2015. "Industry 4.0: The Digital Economy – Challenges and Opportunities for Businesses and the Working World," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(10), pages 03-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:10:p:03-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2015_10_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Falck, Oliver & Heimisch-Roecker, Alexandra & Wiederhold, Simon, 2021. "Returns to ICT skills," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    2. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018. "Robots at Work," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
    3. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2015. "Robots at work: the impact on productivity and jobs," CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 447, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. David H. Autor & David Dorn & Gordon H. Hanson, 2015. "Untangling Trade and Technology: Evidence from Local Labour Markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(584), pages 621-646, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hafenrichter, Julia & Hamann, Silke & Thoma, Oliver & Buch, Tanja & Dengler, Katharina, 2016. "Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt : Folgen für den Arbeitsmarkt in Baden-Württemberg," IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Baden-Württemberg 201603, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    2. Katharina Poschmann, 2015. "Berufliche Weiterbildung im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 84, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Stefan Sauer & Thomas Strobel, 2015. "Technology-Intensive Investment by Branch," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(15), pages 29-32, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertschek, Irene & Briglauer, Wolfgang & Hüschelrath, Kai & Krämer, Jan & Frübing, Stefan & Kesler, Reinhold & Saam, Marianne, 2016. "Metastudie zum Fachdialog Ordnungsrahmen für die Digitale Wirtschaft: Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi)," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 147040.
    2. Keller, Wolfgang & Utar, Hale, 2023. "International trade and job polarization: Evidence at the worker level," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Josten, Cecily & Lordan, Grace, 2019. "Robots at Work: Automatable and Non Automatable Jobs," IZA Discussion Papers 12520, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Heyman, Fredrik & Olsson, Martin, 2022. "Long-Run Effects of Technological Change: The Impact of Automation and Robots on Intergenerational Mobility," Working Paper Series 1451, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 29 Jun 2023.
    5. Harrigan, James & Reshef, Ariell & Toubal, Farid, 2021. "The March of the Techies: Job Polarization Within and Between Firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    6. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    7. Cortes, Guido Matias & Lerche, Adrian & Schönberg, Uta & Tschopp, Jeanne, 2023. "Technological Change, Firm Heterogeneity and Wage Inequality," IZA Discussion Papers 16070, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Piotr Lewandowski & Roma Keister & Wojciech Hardy & Szymon Gorka, 2017. "Routine and ageing? The Intergenerational Divide In The Deroutinisation Of Jobs In Europe," IBS Working Papers 01/2017, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    9. Yining Zhang & Zhong Wu, 2021. "Intelligence and Green Total Factor Productivity Based on China’s Province-Level Manufacturing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    10. David H. Autor, 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 3-30, Summer.
    11. Franziska Hampf & Ludger Woessmann, 2017. "Vocational vs. General Education and Employment over the Life Cycle: New Evidence from PIAAC," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 63(3), pages 255-269.
    12. Jaimovich, Nir & Saporta-Eksten, Itay & Siu, Henry & Yedid-Levi, Yaniv, 2021. "The macroeconomics of automation: Data, theory, and policy analysis," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Prettner, Klaus, 2016. "The implications of automation for economic growth and the labor share," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 18-2016, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    14. Foster-McGregor, Neil & Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2021. "Job Automation Risk, Economic Structure and Trade: a European Perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    15. Kexu Wu & Zhiwei Tang & Longpeng Zhang, 2022. "Population Aging, Industrial Intelligence and Export Technology Complexity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7n49nkmngd8448a5ts5gt5ade0 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Naude, Wim & Nagler, Paula, 2015. "Industrialisation, Innovation, Inclusion," MERIT Working Papers 2015-043, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Marcel Steffen Eckardt, 2022. "Minimum wages in an automating economy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(1), pages 58-91, February.
    19. Gregory, Terry & Salomons, Anna & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145843, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Aina Gallego & Thomas Kurer & Nikolas Schöll, 2018. "Not so disruptive after all: How workplace digitalization affects political preferences," Economics Working Papers 1623, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    21. Dauth, Wolfgang & Findeisen, Sebastian & Südekum, Jens & Wößner, Nicole, 2017. "German robots - the impact of industrial robots on workers," IAB-Discussion Paper 201730, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:10:p:03-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.