IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v62y2009i06p03-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new road tax: more climate protection or tax reduction programme?

Author

Listed:
  • Ferdinand Dudenhöffer
  • Ansgar Belke
  • Winfried Hermann
  • Jürgen Resch

Abstract

On 1 July 2009 the new German road tax will take effect. The taxation of new vehicles will be based partly on the engine volume of the vehicles and partly on carbon dioxide emissions. How do critics view the reform? According to Ferdinand Dudenhoeffer, Center Automotive Research (CAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, the reform fails to meet "all the targets that were set". The tax cements the existing standards, does not provide any incentives for the development of petrol-saving technologies and is unintelligible. For Ansgar Belke, University of Duisburg-Essen, the road tax reform is a step in the right direction since it includes stimuli to purchase a new vehicle with low emissions. However, the engine volume component reduces this effect. In his opinion it would have been better for climate protection, but not politically realisable, to have transferred the road tax to the energy tax. Also the road tax model has no economic steering effect, because it is still much too complicated. Winfried Hermann, Green parliamentary party, sees "much car promotion and little climate protection" in the new law. And for Jürgen Resch, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., the lack of tax incentives for low-carbon vehicles as well as "lowest taxation, by European standards, on climate-killer cars" are the greatest problems of the law. Here Germany has backed away from providing impulses for the development of particularly efficient engines.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferdinand Dudenhöffer & Ansgar Belke & Winfried Hermann & Jürgen Resch, 2009. "The new road tax: more climate protection or tax reduction programme?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(06), pages 03-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:06:p:03-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2009_6_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hartmut Kuhfeld & Uwe Kunert, 2005. "Reform der PKW-Besteuerung überfällig: die Initiative der EU-Kommission zeigt den richtigen Weg," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(49), pages 745-757.
    2. Sinn, Hans-Werner, . "Das grüne Paradoxon ; Plädoyer für eine illusionsfreie Klimapolitik," Monographs in Economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics, number 19627, November.
    3. Janina Ketterer & Johann Wackerbauer, 2009. "The motor vehicle taxis as an instrument for climate protection," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(04), pages 12-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian Dieler & Jana Lippelt, 2012. "Climate notes: Environment taxes – Taxes for the Environment or for the Treasury?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(13), pages 80-82, July.
    2. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Edenhofer, Ottmar & Lessmann, Kai, 2013. "Renewable energy subsidies: Second-best policy or fatal aberration for mitigation?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 217-234.
    3. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Withagen, Cees, 2012. "Too much coal, too little oil," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 62-77.
    4. Quentin Grafton, R. & Kompas, Tom & Van Long, Ngo, 2012. "Substitution between biofuels and fossil fuels: Is there a green paradox?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 328-341.
    5. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Withagen, Cees, 2012. "Is there really a green paradox?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 342-363.
    6. Michael Hoel, 2011. "The Supply Side of CO 2 with Country Heterogeneity," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 113(4), pages 846-865, December.
    7. Frederick van der Ploeg & Cees Withagen, 2015. "Global Warming and the Green Paradox: A Review of Adverse Effects of Climate Policies," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 285-303.
    8. Frederick Van der Ploeg & Cees A. Withagen, 2011. "Too Little Oil, Too Much Coal: Optimal Carbon Tax and when to Phase in Oil, Coal and Renewables," CESifo Working Paper Series 3526, CESifo.
    9. Buchholz Wolfgang & Heindl Peter, 2015. "Ökonomische Herausforderungen des Klimawandels," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 324-350, December.
    10. Frederick Van Der Ploeg & Cees Withagen, 2014. "Growth, Renewables, And The Optimal Carbon Tax," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 55(1), pages 283-311, February.
    11. Tilmann Rave & Michael Thöne & Christian Bergs & Lars Koch, 2010. "Umweltbezogenes Subventionscontrolling," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 49.
    12. Röpke, Luise, 2013. "The development of renewable energies and supply security: A trade-off analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1011-1021.
    13. Johann Wackerbauer & Jutta Albrecht-Saavedra & Marc Gronwald & Janina Ketterer & Jana Lippelt & Johannes Pfeiffer & Luise Röpke & Markus Zimmer, 2011. "Bewertung der klimapolitischen Maßnahmen und Instrumente: eine Studie im Auftrag der E.ON AG," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 51.
    14. Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer, 2010. "Water - a substantial location factor for the Bavarian economy," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 47.
    15. Jutta Albrecht-Saavedra & Johannes Pfeiffer & Jana Lippelt, 2011. "Notes on the climate: Carbon sequestering - is it possible to simply "bury" the climate problem?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(06), pages 53-57, March.
    16. Marc Gronwald & Jana Lippelt, 2011. "Climate notes: Electricity exports, EEG and emissions trading," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(03), pages 34-36, February.
    17. Jana Lippelt, 2010. "Notes on the climate. CO2 amounts in oil, gas and coal," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(06), pages 36-37, March.
    18. Wolfgang Buchholz & Jonas Frank & Hans-Dieter Karl & Johannes Pfeiffer & Karen Pittel & Ursula Triebswetter & Jochen Habermann & Wolfgang Mauch & Thomas Staudacher, 2012. "Die Zukunft der Energiemärkte: Ökonomische Analyse und Bewertung von Potenzialen und Handlungsmöglichkeiten," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 57.
    19. Martin Faulstich & Michael Weber & Christian Hey & Matthias Herms, 2011. "Options for a sustainable energy supply," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(18), pages 05-13, October.
    20. Hoel, Michael, 2013. "Supply Side Climate Policy and the Green Paradox," Memorandum 03/2013, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:06:p:03-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.