IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v69y2023i5id98-2023-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on the geographical indication protection between China and the European Union - From the perspective of the China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwen Qian

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China)

  • Yinguo Dong

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China)

Abstract

Geographical indication (GI) represents the specific good quality and reputation of the regional characteristics of agricultural products, which is a positive approach for stabilising the export of agricultural products, realising high quality and high prices for agricultural products and rural revitalisation. Based on the China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement, this paper discusses the differences between China and the European Union (EU) in terms of GI protection from three aspects: the institutional framework, the operational system, and the operational status of GIs. The purpose of the study is to identify the differences between China and the EU in the protection of GIs, China's shortcomings, and gaps, and to propose policy recommendations for China to protect GI products better, exploit the economic impact of GIs and enhance the competitiveness of China's exports.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong, 2023. "Comparative study on the geographical indication protection between China and the European Union - From the perspective of the China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(5), pages 185-201.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:69:y:2023:i:5:id:98-2023-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/98/2023-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/98/2023-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/98/2023-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/98/2023-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Mérel & Richard J. Sexton, 2012. "Will geographical indications supply excessive quality?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 39(4), pages 567-587, September.
    2. Feng, Shujie, 2020. "Geographical Indications: Can China Reconcile the Irreconcilable Intellectual Property Issue between EU and US?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 424-445, July.
    3. Zago, Angelo M. & Pick, Daniel H., 2004. "Labeling Policies in Food Markets: Private Incentives, Public Intervention, and Welfare Effects," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU geographical indications in Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 598-613, June.
    5. Marie-Vivien, Delphine & Biénabe, Estelle, 2017. "The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Martijn Huysmans & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "No Terroir in the Cold? A Note on the Geography of Geographical Indications," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 550-559, June.
    8. Gangjee, Dev S., 2017. "Proving Provenance? Geographical Indications Certification and its Ambiguities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 12-24.
    9. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Le Goffic, Caroline & Zappalaglio, Andrea, 2017. "The Role Played by the US Government in Protecting Geographical Indications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 35-44.
    11. Tim Josling, 2006. "The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 337-363, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giulia Meloni & Kym Anderson & Koen Deconinck & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "Wine Regulations," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 620-649, December.
    2. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Valentina Raimondi & Chiara Falco & Daniele Curzi & Alessandro Olper, 2020. "Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 330-356, June.
    4. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "The Impact of Protecting EU Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 364-384, January.
    5. Martijn Huysmans & D. van Noord, 2021. "The market for lemons from Sorrento and Gouda from Holland. Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?: Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?," Working Papers 2108, Utrecht School of Economics.
    6. Armelle Mazé, 2023. "Geographical indications as global knowledge commons: Ostrom's law on common intellectual property and collective action," Post-Print hal-04063797, HAL.
    7. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Loïc Henry, 2023. "Adapting the designated area of geographical indications to climate change," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1088-1115, August.
    9. Catherine Haeck & Giulia Meloni & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "The Value of Terroir: A Historical Analysis of the Bordeaux and Champagne Geographical Indications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 598-619, December.
    10. Stranieri, Stefanella & Orsi, Luigi & De Noni, Ivan & Olper, Alessandro, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Jean‐Sauveur Ay, 2021. "The Informational Content of Geographical Indications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 523-542, March.
    12. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2021. "How do local factors shape the regional adoption of geographical indications in Europe? Evidences from France, Italy and Spain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    13. M. Huysmans, 2019. "Exporting protection: EU trade agreements, geographical indications, and gastronationalism," Working Papers 19-26, Utrecht School of Economics.
    14. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2023. "Taste of home: Birth town bias in Geographical Indications," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp23089, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    15. Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU geographical indications in Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 598-613, June.
    16. Annalisa Zezza & Federica Demaria & Maria Rosaria Pupo d'Andrea & Jo Swinnen & Giulia Meloni & Senne Vandevelde & Alessandro Olper & Daniele Curzi & Valentina Raimondi & Sophie Drogue, 2018. "Research for AGRI Committee - Agricultural trade: assessing reciprocity of standards," Working Papers hal-02787948, HAL.
    17. Marion Desquilbet & Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, 2015. "Are geographical indications a worthy quality label? A framework with endogenous quality choice," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 42(1), pages 129-150.
    18. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    19. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong & Yuchen Liu, 2023. "The impact of mutual recognition of geographical indications on the quality upgrading of China’s agricultural exports," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:69:y:2023:i:5:id:98-2023-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.