IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jeehcn/v12y2002i4n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knightian Firm: Uncertainty, Entrepreneurial Judgement and Coordination

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Tony Fu-Lai

    (The University of New South Wales)

Abstract

This paper interprets Knight's views of the firm from the standpoint of his theory of human agency. Focusing on the coordination perspective, this paper argues that Knightian firms are institutions which deal with intersubjective uncertainty. The fundamental principle underlying an organized activity is the reduction of the uncertainty inherent in judgements and decisions by grouping the decisions of a particular individual and estimating the proportion of successes and failures. Coordinating activities by the use of the firm, shift focus and interest from errors in human agents' opinions of things to errors in their opinions of other people. By routinizing some judgements in the form of wage payments, firms allow the coordination of the interests of various parties and thus reduce uncertainty. Furthermore, entrepreneurs conduct economic calculation and bet their judgements on the value of the factors of production they employ. Correct entrepreneurial judgement is the ultimate source of profit. This paper calls for a research agenda on the theory of the firm to incorporate Knight's insights.Cet article interprète la vision knightienne de la firme du point de vue de sa théorie de l'agent humain. En s'intéressant principalement à l'enjeu de la coordination, cet article soutient que les entreprises sont, selon Knight, des institutions qui "agissent" en incertitude intersubjective. Le principe fondamental qui sous-tend une activité organisée est la réduction de l'incertitude inhérent aux jugements et décisions par le regroupement des décisions d'un individu et l'estimation des proportions de succès et d'échecs. Les activités de coordination par le biais de l'entreprise, déplacent le sujet d'étude et l'intérêt des erreurs dans les opinions qu'ont les agents humains à propos des choses vers leurs erreurs d'opinion sur les autres personnes. En rendant routiniers les jugements par la pratique de paiements de salaires, les firmes permettent la coordination des intérêts de parties variées et réduisent ainsi l'incertitude. De plus, les entrepreneurs procèdent à des calculs économiques et fondent leurs jugements sur la valeur des facteurs de production qu'ils emploient. Le jugement entrepreneurial correct est l'ultime source de profit. Cet article plaide en faveur d'un programme de recherche en théorie de l'entreprise qui incorpore les perspectives ouvertes par Knight.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Tony Fu-Lai, 2002. "The Knightian Firm: Uncertainty, Entrepreneurial Judgement and Coordination," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:12:y:2002:i:4:n:1
    DOI: 10.2202/1145-6396.1072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1072
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1145-6396.1072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunning, J. Patrick, 1993. "Entrepreneurists and Firmists: Knight vs. The Modern Theory of the Firm," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 31-53, April.
    2. LeRoy, Stephen F & Singell, Larry D, Jr, 1987. "Knight on Risk and Uncertainty," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 394-406, April.
    3. Barzel, Yoram, 1987. "Knight's 'Moral Hazard' Theory of Organization," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(1), pages 117-120, January.
    4. Richard N. Langlois & Nicolai J. Foss, 1999. "Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 201-218, May.
    5. Langlois, Richard N & Foss, Nicolai J, 1999. "Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 201-218.
    6. Foss, Nicolai J., 1996. "The “Alternative†Theories of Knight and Coase, and the Modern Theory of the Firm," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(1), pages 76-95, April.
    7. Paul L. Robertson & Tony F. Yu, 2001. "Firm strategy, innovation and consumer demand: a market process approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4-5), pages 183-199.
    8. Langlois, Richard N & Cosgel, Metin M, 1993. "Frank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm: A New Interpretation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 31(3), pages 456-465, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tony Fu-Lai Yu, 2003. "A subjectivist approach to strategic management," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 335-345.
    2. Velamuri, Rama & Venkataraman, Sankaran, 2005. "Why stakeholder and stockholder theories are not necessarily contradictory: A knightian insight," IESE Research Papers D/591, IESE Business School.
    3. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    4. Frenken, Koen, 2006. "A fitness landscape approach to technological complexity, modularity, and vertical disintegration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 288-305, September.
    5. Cécile CEZANNE & Laurence SAGLIETTO, 2014. "Human Capital-Intensive Firms and Symbolic Value Creation," Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 70-88.
    6. Liao, Tung-Shan & Rice, John, 2010. "Innovation investments, market engagement and financial performance: A study among Australian manufacturing SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 117-125, February.
    7. Altman, Ira J. & Klein, Peter G. & Johnson, Thomas G., 2006. "Scale as a Transaction Cost Variable in the U.S. Biopower Industry," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21141, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2012. "Innovative Platforms, Complexity and the Knowledge Intensive Firm," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Minkler, Lanse, 2004. "Shirking and motivations in firms: survey evidence on worker attitudes," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 863-884, June.
    10. Kirsten Burkhardt, 2011. "Le rôle des sociétés de capital-risque dans la formation d’alliances stratégiques:Une synthèse de littérature - The Role of Venture Capitalists in the Formation of Strategic Alliances:An academic lite," Working Papers CREGO 1111102, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    11. Nassreddine Garoui & Anis Jarboui, 2012. "Cognitive Approach of Corporate Governance A Visualization Test of Mental models with Cognitive Mapping Technique," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 15(43), pages 61-96, March.
    12. Wink, Ruediger, 2002. "The transregional dimension of territorial knowledge management. An evolutionary perspective on the role of universities," ERSA conference papers ersa02p496, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Nicolai J. Foss, 2014. "Toward an Organizational Economics of Heterogeneous Capabilities," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 15-19, February.
    14. Hoch, Felix & Lohwasser, Todor S., 2019. "The influence of institutions on venture capital: How transaction costs, uncertainty, and change affect new ventures," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 9/2019, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    15. Giampaolo Garzarelli & Matthew Holian, 2014. "Parchment, guns, and the problem of governance," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 71-80, March.
    16. Cézanne, Cécile & Rubinstein, Marianne, 2012. "La RSE comme instrument de gouvernance d’entreprise : une application à l’industrie française des télécommunications," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 12.
    17. Fusari, Angelo, 2016. "A New Economics for Modern Dynamic Economies," MPRA Paper 74008, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    18. Margit Osterloh & Bruno S. Frey, 2000. "Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 538-550, October.
    19. Clive Lawson & Edward Lorenz, 1999. "Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 305-317.
    20. Fusari, Angelo, 2015. "The question of the firm. Organizational forms and dimensions," MPRA Paper 74177, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:12:y:2002:i:4:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.