IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v31y2022i2p668-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to Pay for Status Signals in Online Luxury Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Yuan
  • Mary E. Deily
  • Yuliang Yao

Abstract

We study consumers’ valuation of status signals by estimating their willingness to pay for a luxury item with a quiet vs. a prominent logo. We collected data from two online markets on sales of two luxury handbags that differ principally in the prominence of their logo. We use these data to estimate the premium in consumers’ willingness to pay for the handbag with the quiet logo, and to estimate how the condition of the handbag affects that premium. We find consumers are willing to pay a sizeable premium of $161–$174, or 17%–18% of the retail price, for quiet handbags as compared to loud handbags. Furthermore, while consumers’ willingness to pay for both types of handbags is less for handbags in worse condition, it diminishes more rapidly with the worsening condition for quiet handbags. Our findings suggest that counter to conventional wisdom, consumers are willing to pay more for quietly marked luxury goods that allow them to signal a more targeted group of peers with similar cultural capital or social connectedness.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Yuan & Mary E. Deily & Yuliang Yao, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Status Signals in Online Luxury Markets," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 668-680, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:668-680
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13572
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kapferer, Jean-Noël & Laurent, Gilles, 2016. "Where do consumers think luxury begins? A study of perceived minimum price for 21 luxury goods in 7 countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 332-340.
    2. Jean-Noël Kapferer, 2010. "Luxury after the crisis: Pro logo or no logo?," Post-Print hal-00781524, HAL.
    3. Wilfred Amaldoss & Sanjay Jain, 2015. "Branding Conspicuous Goods: An Analysis of the Effects of Social Influence and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(9), pages 2064-2079, September.
    4. Uri Simonsohn & Dan Ariely, 2008. "When Rational Sellers Face Nonrational Buyers: Evidence from Herding on eBay," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1624-1637, September.
    5. Krista J. Li & Yan Liu, 2019. "Same or Different? An Aesthetic Design Question," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(6), pages 1465-1485, June.
    6. Jonah Berger & Morgan Ward, 2010. "Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(4), pages 555-569, December.
    7. Krista J. Li, 2019. "Status Goods and Vertical Line Extensions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(1), pages 103-120, January.
    8. James D. Abbey & Rainer Kleber & Gilvan C. Souza & Guido Voigt, 2017. "The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 100-115, January.
    9. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2018. "Supply Chain Visibility and Social Responsibility: Investigating Consumers’ Behaviors and Motives," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 617-636, October.
    10. Ravi Bapna & Paulo Goes & Alok Gupta & Gilbert Karuga, 2008. "Predicting Bidders' Willingness to Pay in Online Multiunit Ascending Auctions: Analytical and Empirical Insights," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 345-355, August.
    11. Oliver Hinz & Martin Spann & Il-Horn Hann, 2015. "Research Note—Can’t Buy Me Love…Or Can I? Social Capital Attainment Through Conspicuous Consumption in Virtual Environments," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 859-870, December.
    12. Paulo B. Goes & Gilbert G. Karuga & Arvind K. Tripathi, 2010. "Understanding Willingness-to-Pay Formation of Repeat Bidders in Sequential Online Auctions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 907-924, December.
    13. Ravi Bapna & Wolfgang Jank & Galit Shmueli, 2008. "Consumer Surplus in Online Auctions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 400-416, December.
    14. Chao, Angela & Schor, Juliet B., 1998. "Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 107-131, February.
    15. Erin C. McKie & Mark E. Ferguson & Michael R. Galbreth & Sriram Venkataraman, 2018. "How Do Consumers Choose between Multiple Product Generations and Conditions? An Empirical Study of iPad Sales on eBay," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1574-1594, August.
    16. Wernerfelt, Birger, 1990. "Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(1), pages 91-98, January.
    17. Anh Ninh & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen & Martin A. Lariviere, 2020. "Concavity and Unimodality of Expected Revenue Under Discrete Willingness to Pay Distributions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(3), pages 788-796, March.
    18. Liangfei Qiu & Andrew B. Whinston, 2017. "Pricing Strategies under Behavioral Observational Learning in Social Networks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(7), pages 1249-1267, July.
    19. Bagwell, Laurie Simon & Bernheim, B Douglas, 1996. "Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 349-373, June.
    20. Jean-Noël Kapferer, 2010. "Luxury after the crisis: Pro logo or no logo?," Post-Print hal-00521804, HAL.
    21. Peter Kennedy, 2003. "A Guide to Econometrics, 5th Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 5, volume 1, number 026261183x, December.
    22. Lian Qi & Leon Yang Chu & Rachel R. Chen, 2016. "Quality Provision with Heterogeneous Consumer Reservation Utilities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(5), pages 883-901, May.
    23. Chun‐Hung Chiu & Tsan‐Ming Choi & Xin Dai & Bin Shen & Jin‐Hui Zheng, 2018. "Optimal Advertising Budget Allocation in Luxury Fashion Markets with Social Influences: A Mean‐Variance Analysis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1611-1629, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    2. Zhu, Guowei & Zhang, Jianxiong & Xing, Enfeng & Han, Danke, 2022. "Pricing and quality decisions with conspicuous consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Zhang, Ting & Choi, Tsan-Ming & (Edwin) Cheng, Tai-Chiu, 2024. "Competitive pricing and product strategies in the presence of consumers’ social comparisons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 573-586.
    4. Pino, Giovanni & Amatulli, Cesare & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Nataraajan, Rajan & Guido, Gianluigi, 2019. "Brand prominence and social status in luxury consumption: A comparison of emerging and mature markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 163-172.
    5. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Ramirez, Germán Contreras & Campbell, Jeffrey & Klaus, Philipp, 2021. "The product is me: Hyper-personalized consumer goods as unconventional luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 446-454.
    6. Ho, Foo Nin & Wong, Jared & Brodowsky, Glen, 2023. "Does masstige offer the prestige of luxury without the social costs? Status and warmth perceptions from masstige and luxury signals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    7. Kapferer, Jean-Noël & Valette-Florence, Pierre, 2019. "How self-success drives luxury demand: An integrated model of luxury growth and country comparisons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 273-287.
    8. Jebarajakirthy, Charles & Das, Manish, 2021. "Uniqueness and luxury: A moderated mediation approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Raghunath Singh Rao & Richard Schaefer, 2013. "Conspicuous Consumption and Dynamic Pricing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 786-804, September.
    10. Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele & Björk, Peter & Lönnström, Alexandra & Jauffret, Marie-Nathalie, 2018. "How consumers' need for uniqueness, self-monitoring, and social identity affect their choices when luxury brands visually shout versus whisper," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 72-81.
    11. Park, Sehoon & Kim, Chaeyeong & Park, Jane, 2023. "How power distance belief, self-construal, and relationship norms impact conspicuous consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Janssen, Catherine & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Leblanc, Sina, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-174.
    13. Gianluigi Guido & Cesare Amatulli & Alessandro M. Peluso & Clarissa Matteis & Luigi Piper & Giovanni Pino, 2020. "Measuring internalized versus externalized luxury consumption motivations and consumers’ segmentation," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 25-47, March.
    14. Shen, Bin & Qian, Rongrong & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2017. "Selling luxury fashion online with social influences considerations: Demand changes and supply chain coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 89-99.
    15. Joëlle Vanhamme & Adam Lindgreen & Gülen Sarial-Abi, 2023. "Luxury Ethical Consumers: Who Are They?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 805-838, March.
    16. Holmqvist, Jonas & Wirtz, Jochen & Fritze, Martin P., 2020. "Luxury in the digital age: A multi-actor service encounter perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 747-756.
    17. Zhang, Mengyao & Gou, Qinglong & Yu, Lili & Zhang, Juzhi, 2022. "Pricing decisions for a social comparison product supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Sara Alghanim & Nelson Oly Ndubisi, 2022. "The Paradox of Sustainability and Luxury Consumption: The Role of Value Perceptions and Consumer Income," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Rajesh Bagchi & Sung H. Ham & Chuan He, 2020. "Strategic Implications of Confirmation Bias‐Inducing Advertising," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(6), pages 1573-1596, June.
    20. Wei, Ying & Li, Feng, 2020. "Omnichannel supply chain operations for luxury products with conspicuous consumers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:668-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.