IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v50y1999i3p488-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling and Mapping Agricultural Output Values Using Farm Specific Details and Environmental Databases

Author

Listed:
  • Ian J. Bateman
  • Christine Ennew
  • Andrew A. Lovett
  • Anthony J. Rayner

Abstract

Ongoing concerns regarding the economic losses associated with the CAP and the negative environmental impacts of present land use have led to calls for land use change and consequent efforts to identify areas which are, from both a financial and social perspective, most appropriate for such conversion. This paper develops and applies an output value modelling methodology in which site‐specific biophysical factors are combined with farm level data in order to predict input usage and, subsequently, farm profit. The spatial analytic capabilities of a geographical information system (GIS) are used to combine the variety of data employed to permit analysis of a large study area (the entirety of Wales) and yield models of both the market and shadow value of output from the two principal agricultural sectors of the area: dairying and sheep farming. The GIS is then used to produce readily interpretable maps of these values across the study area. The resulting maps are highly compatible both with value maps of alternative land uses given in the recent literature and with approaches to policy formulation currently under development by a range of UK agencies. Such maps may be used to assist estimation of the extent and location of farming response to land use policy change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian J. Bateman & Christine Ennew & Andrew A. Lovett & Anthony J. Rayner, 1999. "Modelling and Mapping Agricultural Output Values Using Farm Specific Details and Environmental Databases," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 488-511, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:50:y:1999:i:3:p:488-511
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00895.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00895.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00895.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roningen, Vernon O. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1989. "Economic Implications Of Agricultural Policy Reforms In Industrial Market Economies," Staff Reports 278843, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Andrew Moxey, 1996. "Geographical Information Systems And Agricultural Economics," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 115-116, January.
    3. Robert G. Chambers & Rulon D. Pope, 1994. "A Virtually Ideal Production System: Specifying and Estimating the VIPS Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(1), pages 105-113.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danny Campbell & W George Hutchinson & Riccardo Scarpa, 2009. "Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(1), pages 97-111, January.
    2. Troy, Austin & Wilson, Matthew A., 2006. "Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 435-449, December.
    3. Schägner, Jan Philipp & Brander, Luke & Maes, Joachim & Hartje, Volkmar, 2013. "Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 33-46.
    4. van der Horst, Dan, 2006. "Spatial cost-benefit thinking in multi-functional forestry; towards a framework for spatial targeting of policy interventions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 171-180, August.
    5. Léa Tardieu, 2017. "The need for integrated spatial assessments in ecosystem service mapping," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 98(3), pages 173-200, December.
    6. Townsend, Ralph E. & McColl, James & Young, Michael D., 2006. "Design principles for individual transferable quotas," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 131-141, March.
    7. Jan Philipp Schägner & Luke Brander & Joachim Maes & Volkmar Hartje, 2012. "Mapping Ecosystem Services’ Values: Current Practice and Future Prospects," Working Papers 2012.59, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    8. I.J. Bateman & A.P. Jones & A.A. Lovett & I.R. Lake & B.H. Day, 2002. "Applying Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to Environmental and Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(1), pages 219-269, June.
    9. Alessandra La Notte & Sonia Marongiu & Mauro Masiero & Pietro Molfetta & Riccardo Molignoni & Luca Cesaro, 2015. "Livestock and Ecosystem Services: An Exploratory Approach to Assess Agri-Environment-Climate Payments of RDP in Trentino," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mamatzakis, E. C., 2003. "Public infrastructure and productivity growth in Greek agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 169-180, October.
    2. Cameron, D. Lynne & Spriggs, John, 1991. "International Effects Of Canada'S Western Grain Stabilization Program," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Ferris, John N., 1991. "Analysis Of The Past And Future Impacts Of The Wheat, Feed Grains And Conservation Reserve Provisions Of The Food Security Act Of 1985 On U.S. Agriculture," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271269, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Konkoly, Attila, 1996. "Development of a price visualization procedure of cash grain markets using GIS," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000017634, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Won W. Koo, 2002. "Alternative U.S. and EU Sugar Trade Liberalization Policies and their Implications," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 336-352.
    6. van Schalkwyk, H. D. & van Zyl, J. & Jooste, A., 1995. "The Effect Of The Exchange Rate And International Factors On The Competitive Position Of South African Wheat Producers," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 34(4), December.
    7. Tyers, Rod, 1992. "Searching under the Light: The Neglect of Dynamics and Risk in the Analysis of Food Trade Reforms," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197873, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Rulon D. Pope, 2008. "Homogeneity and Supply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(3), pages 606-612.
    9. Knauss-Beary, Lori, 1991. "The effects of agricultural trade liberalization on less developed countries," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000017627, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. James Gleckler & Robert Koopman & Luther Tweeten, 1993. "European economic integration and the consequences for US agriculture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 325-337.
    11. Panos Fousekis & Aspasia Papakonstantinou, 1997. "Economic Capacity Utilisation And Productivity Growth In Greek Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 38-51, January.
    12. Abler, David G & Shortle, James S, 1992. "Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the EC," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 197-217.
    13. Groenewald, Jan A., 1998. "Reconsidering The Role Of Government In Southern African Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(4), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Lord, Ron & Barry, Robert D., 1990. "The World Sugar Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278353, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Hobbs, Jill E. & Kruja, Zana & Martin, Larry J., 1999. "Net Benefits Of Increased Trade Liberalization To The Canadian Economy," Miscellaneous Publications 18089, George Morris Center.
    16. Neff, Liana C. Cuffman, 1990. "The 1990 Farm Bill And Developing Countries," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270907, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Moschini, GianCarlo & Lapan, Harvey E. & Sobolevsky, Andrei, 2000. "Trading Technology As Well As Final Products: Roundup Ready Soybean and Welfare Effects in the Soybean Complex," Staff General Research Papers Archive 5317, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Rausser, Gordon C. & Rose, Marjorie B. & Irwin, Douglas A., 1990. "World commodity prices: the role of external debt and industrial country policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt3gz928h9, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    19. Schmitz, Andrew & Vercammen, James, 1990. "Trade Liberalization in the World Sugar Market: Playing on a Level Field?," CUDARE Working Papers 198574, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. Blayney, Don P. & Fallert, Richard, 1990. "The World Dairy Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278345, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:50:y:1999:i:3:p:488-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.