IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v40y2022i6ne12625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance of organic cocoa production: An analysis of EU regulation through the framework of multilevel governance

Author

Listed:
  • Godfred Adduow Obeng

Abstract

Motivation While organic agriculture is seen as the best way to achieve sustainable agriculture, the question of how actors in the sector can help remains unresolved. This article seeks to contribute to the global determination to resolve environmental challenges through sustainable agricultural practices grounded in multilevel governance. Purpose The article examines existing regulations governing the production and importation of organic cocoa. Methods and approach Multilevel governance is used as a theoretical and methodological tool to examine the discursive and material struggles which challenge the promotion of organic cocoa, using a content analysis of European Union (EU) regulations governing the production and importation of organic agricultural produce, including cocoa. Findings The article finds that the EU regulations on the production and importation of organic cocoa take a vertical approach to multilevel governance. Organic cocoa farmers, who come lower down in the governance hierarchy, have no role in policy‐making and have simply to follow these regulations. Policy implications The regulations seem to ignore the inputs of actors at the lower level in the hierarchy. The absence of organic producers' (farmers) participation in the governance architecture may inhibit conventional farmers from venturing into organic cocoa production.

Suggested Citation

  • Godfred Adduow Obeng, 2022. "Governance of organic cocoa production: An analysis of EU regulation through the framework of multilevel governance," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(6), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:6:n:e12625
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12625
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luanne Lohr, 1998. "Implications of Organic Certification for Market Structure and Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(5), pages 1125-1129.
    2. Paarlberg, Robert, 2013. "Food Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199322381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dariusz Kiełczewski, 2005. "Style konsumpcji jako przejaw zróżnicowania poziomu życia," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5-6, pages 85-100.
    2. Hirschi, Rick L., 2000. "Organic Row Crops In A Diversified Farm Portfolio," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36478, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Adalja, Aaron & Hanson, James & Towe, Charles & Tselepidakis, Elina, 2015. "An Examination of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local Products," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 253-274, December.
    4. Grolleau, Gilles & Caswell, Julie A., 2006. "Interaction Between Food Attributes in Markets: The Case of Environmental Labeling," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(3), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Ghinoi, Stefano & Wesz Junior, Valdemar João & Piras, Simone, 2018. "Political debates and agricultural policies: Discourse coalitions behind the creation of Brazil’s Pronaf," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 68-80.
    6. Marcus Alexander & Matthew C. Harding & Department of Economics & MIT, 2003. "Self-regulation and the Certification of the European Information Economy The Case of e-Healthcare Information Provision," Economics Series Working Papers 154, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    7. Steven C. Blank & Gary D. Thompson, 2004. "Can/Should/Will A Niche Become the Norm? Organic Agriculture's Short Past and Long Future," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 22(4), pages 483-503, October.
    8. Kim Sønderskov & Carsten Daugbjerg, 2011. "The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(4), pages 507-517, December.
    9. Helen Scharber & Anita Dancs, 2016. "Do locavores have a dilemma? Economic discourse and the local food critique," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(1), pages 121-133, March.
    10. Lohr, Luanne & Krissoff, Barry, 2001. "Consumer Effects Of Harmonizing International Standards For Trade In Organic Foods," Faculty Series 16726, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Chi Zhang & Jun He & Guanghui Yuan, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis on DPRK: Will Grain Yield Influence Foreign Policy Tendency?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Mainville, Denise Y. & Zylbersztajn, Decio & Farina, Elizabeth M.M.Q. & Reardon, Thomas, 2005. "Determinants of retailers' decisions to use public or private grades and standards: Evidence from the fresh produce market of Sao Paulo, Brazil," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 334-353, June.
    13. Yang, Pan & Cai, Ximing & Hu, Xinchen & Zhao, Qiankun & Lee, Yuanyao & Khanna, Madhu & Cortés-Peña, Yoel R. & Guest, Jeremy S. & Kent, Jeffrey & Hudiburg, Tara W. & Du, Erhu & John, Steve & Iutzi, Fre, 2022. "An agent-based modeling tool supporting bioenergy and bio-product community communication regarding cellulosic bioeconomy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Hackl, Franz & Kügler, Agnes & Winter-Ebmer, Rudolf, 2011. "Reputation and Certification in Online Shops," Economics Series 279, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    15. Muhammad, Safdar & Fathelrahman, Eihab & Ullah, Rafi Ullah Tasbih, 2015. "Factors Affecting Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Certififed Organic Food Products in United Arab Emirates," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 46(1), pages 1-9, March.
    16. Rodríguez, Elsa Mirta M. & Gentile, Natacha & Lupín, Beatriz & Garrido, Laura, 2006. "El mercado interno de productos orgánicos: actitudes de los consumidores argentinos," Nülan. Deposited Documents 1064, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.
    17. John Cranfield & B. James Deaton & Shreenivas Shellikeri, 2009. "Evaluating Consumer Preferences for Organic Food Production Standards," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(1), pages 99-117, March.
    18. Phillips, Jon C. & Peterson, H. Christopher, 2001. "Demand Overview For Organic Produce," Staff Paper Series 11778, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    19. Chang, Hui-Shung (Christie) & Griffith, Garry R. & Zepeda, Lydia, 2003. "An Overview of the Organic Food Products Market in Australia," Working Papers 12928, University of New England, School of Economics.
    20. Padilla Bravo, Carlos Antonio & Spiller, Achim & Villalobos, Pablo, 2012. "Are Organic Growers Satisfied with the Certification System? A Causal Analysis of Farmers’ Perceptions in Chile," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:6:n:e12625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.