IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v13y2003i30p28-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

`Sector Neutrality‘ and NPM‘Incentives’: Their Use in Eroding the Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Newberry

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Newberry, 2003. "`Sector Neutrality‘ and NPM‘Incentives’: Their Use in Eroding the Public Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 28-34, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:13:y:2003:i:30:p:28-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2003.tb00397.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Newberry, 2001. "Public-Sector Accounting: A Common Reporting Framework?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 11(23), pages 2-7, March.
    2. Graham Scott & Ian Ball & Tony Dale, 1997. "New Zealand's public sector management reform: Implications for the United States," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 357-381.
    3. James M. Buchanan, 1997. "post-socialist political economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1307.
    4. Angela Barnes & Steve Leith, 2001. "Budget Management That Counts: Recent Approaches to Budget and Fiscal Management in New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 01/24, New Zealand Treasury.
    5. Moe, Terry M, 1990. "Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(0), pages 213-253.
    6. Allan D. Barton, 2002. "Public-Sector Accounting:A Common Reporting Framework? A Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 41-49, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    2. Brian West & Garry D. Carnegie, 2010. "Accounting's chaotic margins," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 201-228, February.
    3. Janet Mack & Christine Ryan, 2006. "Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general-purpose financial reports of Australian government departments," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(4), pages 592-612, July.
    4. Mari Kobayashi & Kiyoshi Yamamoto & Keiko Ishikawa, 2016. "The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non‐mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 153-161, June.
    5. Louise Kl00t, 2006. "Budget Reporting in Local Government: Problem or Solution?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(40), pages 72-81, November.
    6. Kathryn Trewavas & Nives Botica Redmayne & Fawzi Laswad, 2012. "The Impact of IFRS Adoption on Public Sector Financial Statements," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 22(1), pages 86-102, March.
    7. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2013. "GAAP, GFS and AASB 1049: perceptions of public sector stakeholders," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 471-496, June.
    8. Susan Newberry, 2004. "Trade in Services: Wider Implications for Accounting Standard-Setters and Accountants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(33), pages 11-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allan D. Barton, 2002. "Public-Sector Accounting:A Common Reporting Framework? A Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 41-49, November.
    2. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    3. Susan Newberry, 2004. "Trade in Services: Wider Implications for Accounting Standard-Setters and Accountants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 14(33), pages 11-21, July.
    4. Kathryn Trewavas & Nives Botica Redmayne & Fawzi Laswad, 2012. "The Impact of IFRS Adoption on Public Sector Financial Statements," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 22(1), pages 86-102, March.
    5. Sheila Ellwood & Susan Newberry, 2007. "Public sector accrual accounting: institutionalising neo‐liberal principles?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(4), pages 549-573, July.
    6. Garry D. Carnegie & Paolo Ferri & Lee D. Parker & Shannon I. L. Sidaway & Eva E. Tsahuridu, 2022. "Accounting as Technical, Social and Moral Practice: The Monetary Valuation of Public Cultural, Heritage and Scientific Collections in Financial Reports," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(4), pages 460-472, December.
    7. Pablo T. Spiller, 2003. "The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 281-306, October.
    8. Thomas Doleys, 2009. "Incomplete Contracting, Commission Discretion and the Origins of EU Merger Control," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 483-506, June.
    9. Kertzman, Ed & Janssen, Richard & Ruster, Marijn, 2003. "E-business in health care: does it contribute to strengthen consumer interest?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 63-73, April.
    10. André Kaiser, 1997. "Types of Democracy," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 9(4), pages 419-444, October.
    11. Eckert, Sandra, 2020. "EU agencies in banking and energy between institutional and policy centralisation," SAFE Working Paper Series 278, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    12. Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan & Landa, Dimitri, 2015. "Political accountability and sequential policymaking," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 95-108.
    13. Peter J. Boettke, 2003. "Milton and Rose Friedman's \"Free to Choose\" and its impact in the global movement toward free market policy: 1979-2003," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Oct, pages 137-152.
    14. Miltos Makris, 2003. "Administrative Bureaus with Standard Operating Procedures," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 03/062, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    15. Susan Newberry & June Pallot, 2006. "New Zealand's Financial Management System: Implications for Democracy," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 221-227, September.
    16. Peter Bils, 2020. "Policymaking with Multiple Agencies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 634-648, July.
    17. Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2013. "The Heartland Intermodal Corridor: public private partnerships and the transformation of institutional settings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-45.
    18. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto H. Stein, 2008. "Veto Players, Intertemporal Interactions and Policy Adaptability: How Do Political Institutions Work?," Research Department Publications 4593, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    19. Mariano Tommasi, 2003. "Crises, institutions politiques et réformes politiques : le bon, le mauvais et l'affreux," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 11(2), pages 49-81.
    20. Ashok Chakravarti, 2012. "Institutions, Economic Performance and the Visible Hand," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14751.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:13:y:2003:i:30:p:28-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.