IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v93y2022i2p381-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the impact of sheltered workshops through the SROI: A case analysis in southern Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Savall Morera
  • Carmen Guzmán
  • Francisco J. Santos

Abstract

The socio‐labour integration of people with disabilities is a major social problem for European countries and, especially, for Spain. Sheltered workshops, with their productive activity, are a kind of Work Integration Social Enterprise (WISE) whose aim is to create jobs for those people, supporting them through an insertion process into the labour market. Given the need to publicize the important role of sheltered workshops, the aim of this study is to contribute to the academic debate by measuring the added value of this kind of social enterprise and to provide empirical evidence of their social and economic impact. To do so, the impact of a specific sheltered workshop, UNEI, located in the Spanish region of Andalusia, is analyzed. Results allow us to conclude that, firstly, there is a demand to measure the impact caused by sheltered workshops and social enterprises in general, and that SROI methodology is the most appropriate methodology. And, secondly, being based on results of this method and on a sensitivity analysis application, sheltered workshops contribute to sustainable development, generating an impact much higher than could be expected, surpassing the economic and personal limits of the people involved and benefitting society as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Savall Morera & Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos, 2022. "Measuring the impact of sheltered workshops through the SROI: A case analysis in southern Spain," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 381-415, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:93:y:2022:i:2:p:381-415
    DOI: 10.1111/apce.12377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12377
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apce.12377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alnoor Ebrahim & V. Kasturi Rangan, 2010. "The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework For Measuring Social Performance," Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-099, Harvard Business School.
    2. Carlo Borzaga & Sara Depedri & Ermanno Tortia, 2010. "The Growth of Organizational Variety in Market Economies: The Case of Social Enterprises," Euricse Working Papers 1003, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    3. Antoni F. Tulla & Ana Vera & Carles Guirado & Natàlia Valldeperas, 2020. "The Return on Investment in Social Farming: A Strategy for Sustainable Rural Development in Rural Catalonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Ross Millar & Kelly Hall, 2013. "Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 923-941, September.
    5. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Martine VÉZINA & Marie-Claire MALO & Majdi BEN SELMA, 2017. "Mature Social Economy Enterprise And Social Innovation: The Case Of The Desjardins Environmental Fund," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 257-278, June.
    6. Roger Spear & Eric Bidet, 2005. "Social enterprise for work integration in 12 european countries: a descriptive analysis," Post-Print hal-02319198, HAL.
    7. Vall Castello, Judit, 2012. "Promoting employment of disabled women in Spain; Evaluating a policy," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 82-91.
    8. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Marek HUDON & Benjamin HUYBRECHTS, 2017. "From Distant Neighbours To Bedmates: Exploring The Synergies Between The Social Economy And Sustainable Development," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 141-154, June.
    9. Filipe Santos, 2012. "A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 335-351, December.
    10. Jane Gibbon & Colin Dey, 2011. "Developments in Social Impact Measurement in the Third Sector: Scaling Up or Dumbing Down?," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 63-72, April.
    11. Nicholls, Alex, 2009. "'We do good things, don't we?': 'Blended Value Accounting' in social entrepreneurship," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 755-769, August.
    12. Roger Spear & Eric Bidet, 2005. "Social enterprise for work integration in 12 european countries: a descriptive analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 195-231, June.
    13. Wuellrich, Jean-Philippe, 2010. "The effects of increasing financial incentives for firms to promote employment of disabled workers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 173-176, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janni Grouleff Nielsen & Rainer Lueg & Dennis van Liempd, 2019. "Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Jessica Aschari-Lincoln & Claus D. Jacobs, 2018. "Enabling Effective Social Impact: Towards a Model for Impact Scaling Agreements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Nicholls, Alex, 2010. "Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 394-415, May.
    4. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    5. Edward N. Gamble & Haley A. Beer, 2017. "Spiritually Informed Not-for-profit Performance Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 451-468, March.
    6. Hochstädter, Anna Katharina, 2017. "Impact measurement in venture philanthropy organizationsː A single case study," WiSo-HH Working Paper Series 42, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, WISO Research Laboratory.
    7. Pesci, Caterina & Costa, Ericka & Andreaus, Michele, 2020. "Using accountability to shape the common good," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    8. Baudot, Lisa & Dillard, Jesse & Pencle, Nadra, 2020. "The emergence of benefit corporations: A cautionary tale," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    9. Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano & Pilar Tirado-Valencia & Antonio Sianes & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez & Mª Carmen López-Martín, 2020. "SROI Methodology for Public Administration Decisions about Financing with Social Criteria. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Murphy Patrick J. & Pollack Jeff & Nagy Brian & Rutherford Matthew & Coombes Susan, 2019. "Risk Tolerance, Legitimacy, and Perspective: Navigating Biases in Social Enterprise Evaluations," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Nan L. Maxwell & Dana Rotz, 2017. "Potential Assistance for Disadvantaged Workers: Employment Social Enterprises," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 145-168, June.
    13. Lopez-Cozar, C. & Priede, T. & Rodríguez-Lopez, A., 2015. "Evaluating The Legal Environment For Social Entrepreneurship In America And Europe," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 24(1), pages 101-110.
    14. Wei Deng & Qiaozhuan Liang & Peihua Fan & Lin Cui, 2020. "Social entrepreneurship and well-being: The configurational impact of institutions and social capital," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1013-1037, December.
    15. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    16. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    17. Molecke, Greg & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2017. "Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 550-568.
    18. Julien Kleszczowski, 2016. "La place des parties prenantes dans l’évaluation de l’impact social des organisations non lucratives: étude empirique au sein d’une organisation française," Post-Print hal-01901230, HAL.
    19. Thomas Barnay & Emmanuel Duguet & Yann Videau, 2022. "Did the 2005 French Disabled workers Act increase the employment rate of people with disabilities? An econometric evaluation on panel data," Erudite Working Paper 2022-01, Erudite.
    20. Roy, Michael J. & Donaldson, Cam & Baker, Rachel & Kerr, Susan, 2014. "The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: A model and systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 182-193.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:93:y:2022:i:2:p:381-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.