IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/262670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hazardous Materials Transportation with Multiple Objectives: A Case Study in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Ta-Yin
  • Chang, Ya-Han

Abstract

Hazardous material (hazmat) transportation has been an important issue for handling hazardous materials, such as gases and chemical liquids. In the past, researchers have made great efforts to develop policies and route planning methods for hazmat transportation problems. In 2014, Kaohsiung City in Taiwan suffered a gas pipeline explosion at midnight; 32 people were killed, and hundreds of people were injured. After the incident, policies and routing strategies for hazardous materials (hazmat) transportation in Kaohsiung were initiated to avoid pipeline transportation. Although methodologies for hazmat transportation have been proposed and implemented to minimize potential risks, multiple objectives need to be considered in the process to facilitate hazmat transportation in Taiwan. In order to consider both government and operators’ aspects, a multi-objective formulation for the hazmat problem is proposed and a compromise programming method is applied to solve the problem with two objectives: travel cost and risk. The path risk is defined based on risk assessment indexes, such as road characteristics, population distribution, link length, hazardous material characteristics, and accident rates. An aggregate risk indicator is proposed for roadway segments. The compromise programming approach is developed from the concept of compromise decision and the main idea is to search the compromise solution closest to the ideal solution. The proposed method is applied to Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. The results show that two conflicting objectives keep making trade-offs between each other until they finally reach a compromise solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Ta-Yin & Chang, Ya-Han, 2016. "Hazardous Materials Transportation with Multiple Objectives: A Case Study in Taiwan," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 55(3), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:262670
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262670/files/Hazmat-A-Case-Study-in-Taiwan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262670/files/Hazmat-A-Case-Study-in-Taiwan.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rongrong Li & Yee Leung, 2011. "Multi-objective route planning for dangerous goods using compromise programming," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 249-271, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nasrin Asgari & Mohsen Rajabi & Masoumeh Jamshidi & Maryam Khatami & Reza Zanjirani Farahani, 2017. "A memetic algorithm for a multi-objective obnoxious waste location-routing problem: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 279-308, March.
    2. Sadeghi, Mohammad & Yaghoubi, Saeed, 2024. "Optimization models for cloud seeding network design and operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1146-1167.
    3. Ditta, A. & Figueroa, O. & Galindo, G. & Yie-Pinedo, R., 2019. "A review on research in transportation of hazardous materials," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Sazvar, Z. & Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J. & Baboli, A. & Akbari Jokar, M.R., 2014. "A bi-objective stochastic programming model for a centralized green supply chain with deteriorating products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 140-154.
    5. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    6. Hao Wang & Quan Liu & Hongyang Zhang & Yinlong Jin & Wenzhen Yu, 2022. "A Two-Stage Decision-Making Method Based on WebGIS for Bulk Material Transportation of Hydropower Construction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2016. "The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 316-333.
    8. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Asgari, Nasrin & Zanjirani Farahani, Reza & Bourlakis, Michael & Laker, Benjamin, 2020. "Fairness in hazmat routing-scheduling: A bi-objective Stackelberg game," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Xifei Huang & Xinhao Wang & Jingjing Pei & Ming Xu & Xiaowu Huang & Yun Luo, 2018. "Risk assessment of the areas along the highway due to hazardous material transportation accidents," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1181-1202, September.
    10. Rongrong Li & Yee Leung & Hui Lin & Bo Huang, 2013. "An adaptive compromise programming method for multi-objective path optimization," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 211-228, April.
    11. Yee Leung & Rongrong Li & Nannan Ji, 2017. "Application of extended Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence in accident probability estimation for dangerous goods transportation," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 249-271, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics; Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:262670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.