IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/175041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Try Lean? A Northumbrian Farm Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Colgan, Conor
  • Adam, George
  • Topolansky, Federico

Abstract

The purpose of this research paper is to evaluate the applicability and potential benefits of Lean Principles to a farm business. This research opted for a case study research strategy that is implemented through in-depth personal interviews with different actors along the supply chain. This is augmented by further data collection from experts in the field of Lean. Using the Five Principles of Lean, Value Stream Mapping and the Seven Wastes this study suggests that there are benefits from applying Lean Principles to a farm business in terms of reducing waste and improving the quality of food supply. The present study makes a contribution to the validity of Lean principles when applied to an agribusiness context.

Suggested Citation

  • Colgan, Conor & Adam, George & Topolansky, Federico, 2013. "Why Try Lean? A Northumbrian Farm Case Study," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 2(3), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:175041
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.175041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/175041/files/170_Colgan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.175041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Edwards Deming, 2000. "Out of the Crisis," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262541157, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julia Kleineidam, 2020. "Fields of Action for Designing Measures to Avoid Food Losses in Logistics Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Julius Brinken & Sebastian Trojahn & Fabian Behrendt, 2022. "Sufficiency, Consistency, and Efficiency as a Base for Systemizing Sustainability Measures in Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avner Engel & Shalom Shachar, 2006. "Measuring and optimizing systems' quality costs and project duration," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 259-280, September.
    2. Stéphanie Camaréna, 2021. "Engaging with Artificial Intelligence (AI) with a Bottom-Up Approach for the Purpose of Sustainability: Victorian Farmers Market Association, Melbourne Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Cam Caldwell & Do Truong & Pham Linh & Anh Tuan, 2011. "Strategic Human Resource Management as Ethical Stewardship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 171-182, January.
    4. Iskra Panteleeva, 2013. "Changing roles and behaviour of human resources managers in the industrial businesses," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 82-96.
    5. Scott Victor Valentine, 2010. "The Green Onion: a corporate environmental strategy framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(5), pages 284-298, September.
    6. Cam Caldwell & Rolf Dixon & Larry Floyd & Joe Chaudoin & Jonathan Post & Gaynor Cheokas, 2012. "Transformative Leadership: Achieving Unparalleled Excellence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(2), pages 175-187, August.
    7. Bossink, B.A.G., 2003. "Coinnovation research : manual for experiential research into organizational coinnovation," Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Hong Wan & Xiaowei Xu & Tian Ni, 2013. "The incentive effect of acceptance sampling plans in a supply chain with endogenous product quality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 111-124, March.
    9. Cam Caldwell & Mark McConkie & Bryan Licona, 2014. "Simon Peter and Transformative Leadership: Leadership Insights for Today¡¯s Leaders," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 18-32, February.
    10. Kyle J. Mayer & Jack A. Nickerson & Hideo Owan, 2004. "Are Supply and Plant Inspections Complements or Substitutes? A Strategic and Operational Assessment of Inspection Practices in Biotechnology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(8), pages 1064-1081, August.
    11. T.A. Salimova & V.I. Makolov, 2016. "Unused Potential of Quality Management Systems of the Russian Companies: an Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 150-166.
    12. Sergey Sergeevich Skobkin & Yana Andreevna Belavina & Kalita Gleb Vadimovich, 2017. "Methodological Approaches to the Formation of the Quality Management System for Hotels in Russian Federation," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 128-136.
    13. V. V. Okrepilov, 2022. "Economics of Quality: The Most Important Direction in the Development of Economic Science," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 519-528, October.
    14. Engelseth, Per & Pujawan, I Nyoman & Ushada, Mirwan, 2018. "Continuous Handling of Uncertainty in Food Chains: Using the House of Risk Model in Ecosystems," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276882, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    15. Askeland, Tore & Flage, Roger & Aven, Terje, 2017. "Moving beyond probabilities – Strength of knowledge characterisations applied to security," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 196-205.
    16. Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2005. "Quality Assurance in the Agrofood Sector: An Organizational-Sociological Perspective," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 40, March.
    17. Reményi, Christoph & Staudacher, Stephan, 2014. "Systematic simulation based approach for the identification and implementation of a scheduling rule in the aircraft engine maintenance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 94-107.
    18. Dejan Križaj, 2020. "Integration of Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Innovation in Tourism: The QCII Model," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 97-110.
    19. Cam Caldwell & Larry Floyd & Ryan Atkins & Russell Holzgrefe, 2012. "Ethical Duties of Organizational Citizens: Obligations Owed by Highly Committed Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 285-299, October.
    20. Cam Caldwell & Verl Anderson & Marija Runic Ristic, 2021. "Employee Engagement and the Ethic of Friendship," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-54, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:175041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.