IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/10011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inconsistent Objectives of Agricultural Export Credit Disciplines

Author

Listed:
  • Thompson, Wyatt

Abstract

Negotiated disciplines on export credits in agriculture are intended to (1) eliminate any subsidy element caused by preferential financing or low fees and (2) provide special and differential treatment for developing countries. Inconsistent foundations of these two objectives limit the potential for negotiations on the disciplines to succeed. The subsidy element cannot be eliminated without agreement on the benchmark. Eliminating all advantage relative to private institutions precludes any reason to continue government support. Favourable financing to developing countries would introduce a prohibited subsidy. In their capacity to provide special and differential treatment, export credits fall well short of the requirements for food aid.

Suggested Citation

  • Thompson, Wyatt, 2007. "Inconsistent Objectives of Agricultural Export Credit Disciplines," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:10011
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.10011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10011/files/08010069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.10011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahl, Bruce L. & Wilson, William W. & Gustafson, Cole R., 1995. "Valuing Option Provisions for Export Credit Guarantees," Agricultural Economics Reports 23269, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    2. Diersen, Matthew A. & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L. & Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara, 1997. "Additionality Of Credit Guarantees For U.S. Wheat Exports," Agricultural Economics Reports 23425, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Daniel A. Sumner, 1995. "Agricultural Trade Policy: Letting Markets Work," Books, American Enterprise Institute, number 53513, September.
    4. Benitah, Marc, 2005. "U.S. Agricultural Export Credits after the WTO Cotton Ruling: The Law of Unintended Consequences," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(2), pages 1-8.
    5. Hyberg, Bengt & Smith, Mark & Skully, David & Davison, Cecil, 1995. "Export credit guarantees: The commodity credit corporation and US agricultural export policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 27-39, February.
    6. Rude, James, 2000. "Reform of Agricultural Export Credit Programs," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13.
    7. Dahl, Bruce L. & Johnson, D. Demcey & Wilson, William W. & Gustafson, Cole R., 1995. "Credit Guarantee Programs in International Grain Markets: Background and Issues," Agricultural Economics Reports 23331, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    8. Goodloe, Carol, 2004. "The Canadian Wheat Board: Government Guarantees and Hidden Subsidies?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(2), pages 1-18.
    9. Goodloe, Carol, 2004. "The Canadian Wheat Board: Government Guarantees and Hidden Subsidies," Agricultural Marketing Policy Papers 29160, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Agricultural Marketing Policy Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Innes, Brian G. & Kerr, William A. & Hobbs, Jill E., 2007. "International Product Differentiation through a Country Brand: An Economic Analysis of National Branding as a Marketing Strategy for Agricultural Products," Commissioned Papers 6131, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    2. Cardwell, Ryan T., 2008. "Food Aid and the WTO: Can New Rules Be Effective?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young, Linda M. & Abbott, Philip C. & Leetmaa, Susan E., 2001. "Export Competition: Issues And Options In The Agricultural Negotiations," Commissioned Papers 14624, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Diersen, Matthew A. & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L. & Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara, 1997. "Additionality Of Credit Guarantees For U.S. Wheat Exports," Agricultural Economics Reports 23425, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Diersen, Matthew A. & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce L. & Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara, 1997. "Additionality Of Credit Guarantees For U.S. Wheat Exports; Summary," Agricultural Economics Reports 23240, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    4. Rude, James & Meilke, Karl D., 2006. "Canadian Agriculture and the Doha Development Agenda: The Challenges," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17.
    5. repec:ags:aare02:125165 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara & Johnson, D. Demcey, 1998. "Credit Guarantee Programs And U.S. Market Share In Selected Wheat Import Markets," Agricultural Economics Reports 23284, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    7. Rude, James, 2000. "Reform of Agricultural Export Credit Programs," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13.
    8. Rude, James & Meilke, Karl D., 2005. "Implications of the July 2004 WTO Framework Agreement for Canadian Agriculture," Trade Policy Briefs 24150, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    9. Rienstra-Munnicha, Paul & Mulik, Kranti & Koo, Won W., 2006. "Empirically Analyzing The Impact Of U.S. Export Credit Programs On U.S. Agricultural Trade," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23644, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    10. Joseph A. McMahon, 2007. "Trade Policy Reform Through Litigation La voie judiciaire pour réformer les politiques commerciales Reform der Handelspolitik durch Rechtsstreitigkeiten," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 42-47, August.
    11. Dahl, Bruce L. & Wilson, William W. & Gustafson, Cole R., 1999. "Option Values For Provisions In Export Credit Guarantees," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Wilson, William W. & Johnson, D. Demcey & Dahl, Bruce L., 1999. "Transparency And Export Subsidies In International Wheat Competition," Agricultural Economics Reports 23208, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    13. Mainardi, Stefano, 2001. "Limited arbitrage in international wheat markets: threshold and smooth transition cointegration," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(3), pages 1-26.
    14. Seyoum, Emayenesh & Goddard, Ellen & MacLaren, Donald & Griffith, Garry, 2002. "Modelling World Dairy Trade: The Potential Impact of Officially Supported Export Credits on the Australian Dairy Industry," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 183422, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. E. C. Pasour, Jr., 2004. "Agricultural Economists and the State," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 1(1), pages 106-133, April.
    16. Young, Linda M., 2005. "Export Competition Disciplines in the Doha Round," Trade Issues Papers 14573, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    17. Gardner, Bruce L., 1997. "Returns to Policy-Related Social Science Research in Agriculture," Working Papers 197845, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. James Rude & Jean-Philippe Gervais, 2007. "An Analysis of a Rules-based Approach to Disciplining Export Credits in Agriculture," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 441-463.
    19. Paul Rienstra-Munnicha & Calum G. Turvey, 2002. "The Relationship between Exports, Credit Risk and Credit Guarantees," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(3), pages 281-296, November.
    20. Pawlak, Karolina, 2011. "The evolution of the agricultural protectionism and its measures," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 11(26), pages 1-10, September.
    21. Dahl, Bruce L. & Wilson, William W. & Gustafson, Cole R., 1995. "Valuing Option Provisions for Export Credit Guarantees," Agricultural Economics Reports 23269, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:10011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.