IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v2(631)y2022i2(631)p175-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the performance of mutual funds

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin ANGHELACHE

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Mădălina-Gabriela ANGHEL

    (Artifex University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ștefan Virgil IACOB

    (Artifex University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Iulian RADU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

An open-ended mutual fund is an institution designed to provide both diversification and professional management at a relatively low cost. The directors consider issuing new shares or withdrawing old shares at any time, depending on the evolution of the capital market. In this context, in the article we started from identifying the possibilities to consider mutual portfolios as diversified ones, being included, as a rule, over 100 different titles. This is due more to the size of the fund than to the desire to minimize risk. In these circumstances, given that most funds diversify extensively, volatility should provide a good arrangement for variability to ensure a fairly high return on capital market placement. The purpose of this article was to clarify the issues related to these mutual funds, so that the analysis focuses on determining what is the prospect of achieving a reasonable return from the point of view of the holder of the invested portfolios. The methodology used was, by taking brief but important examples, what the situations are and how the mutual portfolios placed on the market behave. We used the graphical representations, but also a method of analysis by using the Dow-Jones portfolio, consisting of 23 funds with low rates. We also used the logical method of interpreting and comparing the results obtained in different circumstances, indicating through some models what should be the analytical capacity of investors of asset portfolios on the capital market.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mădălina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Ștefan Virgil IACOB & Iulian RADU, 2022. "Assessing the performance of mutual funds," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(631), S), pages 175-186, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:2(631):y:2022:i:2(631):p:175-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1603.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1603&rid=147
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geromichalos, Athanasios & Simonovska, Ina, 2014. "Asset liquidity and international portfolio choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 342-380.
    2. Merton, Robert C., 1971. "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 373-413, December.
    3. Gabriela Victoria ANGHELACHE & Madalina Gabriela ANGHEL & Gyorgy BODO, 2016. "Model of Static Portfolio Choices in an Arrow-Debreu Economy," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 54-59, January.
    4. Madalina Gabriela ANGHEL & Gyorgy BODO & Okwiet BARTEK, 2016. "Model of Static Portfolio Choices," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 49-53, January.
    5. Cox, John C. & Huang, Chi-fu, 1989. "Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 33-83, October.
    6. Jialun Li & Kent Smetters, 2011. "Optimal Portfolio Choice with Wage-Indexed Social Security," NBER Working Papers 17025, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Campbell Harvey & John Liechty & Merrill Liechty & Peter Muller, 2010. "Portfolio selection with higher moments," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(5), pages 469-485.
    8. West, Kenneth D., 2012. "Econometric analysis of present value models when the discount factor is near one," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 86-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mădălina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Ștefan Virgil IACOB & Dana Luiza GRIGORESCU, 2022. "Model for estimating the profitability of placing asset portfolios on the capital market," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(2(631), S), pages 187-195, Summer.
    2. Auffret, Philippe, 2001. "An alternative unifying measure of welfare gains from risk-sharing," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2676, The World Bank.
    3. Hong‐Chih Huang, 2010. "Optimal Multiperiod Asset Allocation: Matching Assets to Liabilities in a Discrete Model," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(2), pages 451-472, June.
    4. Bjork, Tomas, 2009. "Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199574742.
    5. E. Nasakkala & J. Keppo, 2008. "Hydropower with Financial Information," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5-6), pages 503-529.
    6. Castañeda, Pablo & Devoto, Benjamín, 2016. "On the structural estimation of an optimal portfolio rule," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 290-300.
    7. Detemple, Jerome & Sundaresan, Suresh, 1999. "Nontraded Asset Valuation with Portfolio Constraints: A Binomial Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(4), pages 835-872.
    8. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Michel Kschonnek & Rudi Zagst, 2022. "Portfolio optimization: not necessarily concave utility and constraints on wealth and allocation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 101-140, February.
    9. Carole Bernard & Franck Moraux & Ludger R�schendorf & Steven Vanduffel, 2015. "Optimal payoffs under state-dependent preferences," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 1157-1173, July.
    10. Christoph Belak & An Chen & Carla Mereu & Robert Stelzer, 2014. "Optimal investment with time-varying stochastic endowments," Papers 1406.6245, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    11. Roche, Hervé & Tompaidis, Stathis & Yang, Chunyu, 2013. "Why does junior put all his eggs in one basket? A potential rational explanation for holding concentrated portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 775-796.
    12. Gerrard, Russell & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vodička, Peter, 2023. "On optimal constrained investment strategies for long-term savers in stochastic environments and probability hedging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 948-962.
    13. Munk, Claus & Sorensen, Carsten, 2004. "Optimal consumption and investment strategies with stochastic interest rates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1987-2013, August.
    14. Guiyuan Ma & Song-Ping Zhu, 2022. "Revisiting the Merton Problem: from HARA to CARA Utility," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 651-686, February.
    15. Bhamra, Harjoat S. & Coeurdacier, Nicolas & Guibaud, Stéphane, 2014. "A dynamic equilibrium model of imperfectly integrated financial markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 490-542.
    16. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    17. Bernard, Carole & Chen, Jit Seng & Vanduffel, Steven, 2015. "Rationalizing investors’ choices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-23.
    18. Andrew Ang & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Mark M. Westerfield, 2014. "Portfolio Choice with Illiquid Assets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2737-2761, November.
    19. Liu, Jun & Pan, Jun, 2003. "Dynamic derivative strategies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 401-430, September.
    20. Wang, Yuanrong & Aste, Tomaso, 2023. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with inverse covariance clustering," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117701, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:2(631):y:2022:i:2(631):p:175-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marin Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.