IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v25y2023i62p163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents of Consumer Intentions towards E-waste Recycling. A Perspective on the Toy Industry from Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe

    (University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Victor Lorin Purcarea

    (University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Consuela Madalina Gheorghe

    (University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Building a circular economy in Romania has raised several challenges, specifically referring to the management of electronic waste. Although Romania has made significant progress in the collection, recycling, and recovery of large waste, little attention has been paid to recycling small electronic waste, such as toys. The Romanian toy market is extremely attractive because there is no real competition and the barriers to entry on the market are almost nonexistent. This fact results in a powerful industry that would not be affected by any economic and health crisis, and that grows yearly, but produces significant e-waste. Thus, addressing the issue of e-waste management in the toy industry has positive implications for both Romania and the EU. This study expands the existing literature on circular economy by investigating consumers' intention to participate in e-waste recycling in the Romanian toy industry. The sample was made up of 291 mothers, with ages of more than 50 years (35,1%), university degrees (84%) and who usually do not recycle products (35,7%). Several antecedents have been identified that influence consumers' intention to recycle electrical toys and integrate them into an empirical model. Using structural equation modeling, the model was validated, and the findings revealed that the intention to recycle toys was influenced by the attitude towards e-waste electrical toys recycling, self-efficacy, and social norms, in contrast to the following variables that were not statistically significant in the context of the toy industry: awareness, social influence, and measures of the government and NGO. The results of this study provide important information for the implementation of the good practices of circular economy by educating the population and, at the same time, raising awareness through social marketing campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe & Victor Lorin Purcarea & Consuela Madalina Gheorghe, 2023. "Antecedents of Consumer Intentions towards E-waste Recycling. A Perspective on the Toy Industry from Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 163-163, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:25:y:2023:i:62:p:163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3180.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María D. Bovea & Valeria Ibáñez-Forés & Victoria Pérez-Belis & Pablo Juan & Marta Braulio-Gonzalo & Carlos Díaz-Ávalos, 2018. "Incorporation of Circular Aspects into Product Design and Labelling: Consumer Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Vasile Alecsandru Strat & Cristian Teodor & Andreea Simona Saseanu, 2018. "The Characterization of the Romanian Circular Economy’s Potential, at County Level," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(48), pages 278-278.
    3. Kataria, Mitesh & Larsén, Karin, 2009. "Effects of social marketing on battery collection," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 429-433.
    4. Oana Dobre-Baron & Alina Nițescu & Dorina Niță & Cătălin Mitran, 2022. "Romania’s Perspectives on the Transition to the Circular Economy in an EU Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Horațiu Vermeșan & Alexandrina Mangău & Ancuța-Elena Tiuc, 2020. "Perspectives of Circular Economy in Romanian Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-29, August.
    6. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:48:p:278 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Vicktoria Blake & Trisia Farrelly & Jonathon Hannon, 2019. "Is Voluntary Product Stewardship for E-Waste Working in New Zealand? A Whangarei Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Berglund, Christer, 2006. "The assessment of households' recycling costs: The role of personal motives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 560-569, April.
    9. Tetiana Shevchenko & Kirsi Laitala & Yuriy Danko, 2019. "Understanding Consumer E-Waste Recycling Behavior: Introducing a New Economic Incentive to Increase the Collection Rates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    11. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:105 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    13. Annegrete Bruvoll & Karine Nyborg, 2004. "The Cold Shiver of Not Giving Enough: On the Social Cost of Recycling Campaigns," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(4).
    14. Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe & Victor Lorin Purcarea & Consuela Mãdãlina Gheorghe, 2019. "Pro-Environmental Behavior and Bioeconomy: Reflections on Single-Bottled Water Consumption," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 105-105, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Codruța Cornelia Dura & Ana Maria Mihaela Iordache & Alexandru Ionescu & Claudia Isac & Teodora Odett Breaz, 2022. "Analyzing Performance in Wholesale Trade Romanian SMEs: Framing Circular Economy Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-34, May.
    2. Oana Dobre-Baron & Alina Nițescu & Dorina Niță & Cătălin Mitran, 2022. "Romania’s Perspectives on the Transition to the Circular Economy in an EU Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Deepak Singhal & Sarat Kumar Jena & Satyabrata Aich & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Remanufacturing for Circular Economy: Understanding the Impact of Manufacturer’s Incentive under Price Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Briguglio, Marie & Delaney, Liam & Wood, Alex, 2018. "Partisanship, priming and participation in public-good schemes," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 136-150.
    5. Pfister, Naomi & Mathys, Nicole A., 2022. "Waste taxes at work: Evidence from the canton of Vaud in Switzerland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Mohammed Laeequddin & Waheed Kareem Abdul & Vinita Sahay & Aviral Kumar Tiwari, 2022. "Factors That Influence the Safe Disposal Behavior of E-Waste by Electronics Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Hage, Olle & Söderholm, Patrik & Berglund, Christer, 2009. "Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: Empirical evidence from Sweden," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 155-165.
    8. Elsy Lediana & Tomy Perdana & Yosini Deliana & Tuhpawana P. Sendjaja, 2023. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention of Youth for Agriculture Start-Up: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Matsumoto, Shigeru, 2020. "Do individuals free ride on participation in environmental policies? Personal values and waste management practices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Filippo Corsini & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Marco Frey, 2020. "Consumer’s Circular Behaviors in Relation to the Purchase, Extension of Life, and End of Life Management of Electrical and Electronic Products: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Prestin, Abby & Pearce, Katy E., 2010. "We care a lot: Formative research for a social marketing campaign to promote school-based recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1017-1026.
    12. Barbara Bigliardi & Domenico Campisi & Giovanna Ferraro & Serena Filippelli & Francesco Galati & Alberto Petroni, 2020. "The Intention to Purchase Recycled Products: Towards an Integrative Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Ek, Claes, 2018. "Prosocial behavior and policy spillovers: A multi-activity approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 356-371.
    14. Liliana Topliceanu & Petru Gabriel Puiu & Catalin Drob & Vlad Vasile Topliceanu, 2022. "Analysis Regarding the Implementation of the Circular Economy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, December.
    15. Elzbieta Szczygiel, 2023. "Circular Behaviours of Polish Consumers in Relation to Electrical and Electronic Products," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 213-213, February.
    16. Renske van den Berge & Lise Magnier & Ruth Mugge, 2023. "Until death do us part? In‐depth insights into Dutch consumers’ considerations about product lifetimes and lifetime extension," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 908-922, June.
    17. Bohara, Alok K. & Caplan, Arthur J. & Grijalva, Therese, 2007. "The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 433-443, December.
    18. Luisa Corrado & Andrea Fazio & Alessandra Pelloni, 2020. "Pro-environmental attitudes, local environmental conditions and recycling behavior," Working Paper series 20-21, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis, revised Nov 2021.
    19. Campbell, Benjamin & Khachatryan, Hayk & Behe, Bridget & Hall, Charles & Dennis, Jennifer, 2016. "Crunch the can or throw the bottle? Effect of “bottle deposit laws” and municipal recycling programs," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 98-109.
    20. Ionuț Nica & Nora Chiriță & Camelia Delcea, 2023. "Towards a Sustainable Future: Economic Cybernetics in Analyzing Romania’s Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-36, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Circular economy; waste management; toy industry; e-waste recycling; consumer decision making; structural equation modeling; social marketing.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:25:y:2023:i:62:p:163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.