Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Colorado (United States), as of November 2014

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Colorado (United States), there are 96 authors affiliated with 20 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Rankings for the United States and links to state rankings are available here.

Top 25% institutions in Colorado (United States)

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Department of Economics, University of Colorado

Boulder, Colorado (USA)

13127.38
2[2]Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines

Golden, Colorado (USA)

2.24109.9
3[3]Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University

Fort Collins, Colorado (USA)

2.871110.9
4[4]Economics Department, University of Colorado Denver

Denver, Colorado (USA)

3.6854
5[5]Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado

Boulder, Colorado (USA)

6.2444

Top 25% authors in Colorado (United States)

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[1]James R. Markusen

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

1.16
2[3]Keith E. Maskus

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

2.59
3[6]Yongmin Chen

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

3.23
4[5]John Loomis

Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

4.31
5[8]Daniel I. Rees

Economics Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver

6.93
6[9]John T. Cuddington

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

7.24
7[2]Wolfgang Keller

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

7.49
8[11]Jack Strauss

Daniels School of Business, University of Denver, Denver

11.52
9[12]Jeffrey Zax

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

11.54
10[13]Charles de Bartolome

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

11.86
11[10]Philip E. Graves

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

12.07
12[7]Murat F. Iyigun

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

12.38
13[16]Edward R. Morey

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

14.05
14[18]Nicholas E. Flores

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

14.27
15[19]Edward J. Balistreri

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

14.9
16[17]Haider Khan

15.51
17[24]William H. Kaempfer

Carl McGuire Center for International Studies, Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

18.17
18[21]Liang Peng

Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado, Boulder

18.74
19[22]Edwin Woodrow Eckard

Business School, University of Colorado Denver, Denver

19.12
20[23]Robert McNown

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

19.41
21[20]Carol A. Dahl

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

19.44
22[25]Graham Anthony Davis

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

21.96
23[26]John Elder

Department of Finance and Real Estate, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

22.12
24[29]Terra McKinnish

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

22.31

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.