Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Tennessee (United States), as of June 2013

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Tennessee (United States), there are 98 authors affiliated with 19 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Rankings for the United States and links to state rankings are available here.

Top 25% institutions in Tennessee (United States)

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee (USA)

13129.15
2[2]Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee (USA)

2.2465.16
3[3]College of Business, University of Tennessee-Knoxville

Knoxville, Tennessee (USA)

3.021816.33
---[---]Department of Economics, College of Business, University of Tennessee-Knoxville

Knoxville, Tennessee (USA)

4.341713.1
4[5]Jennings A. Jones College of Business, Middle Tennessee State University

Murfreesboro, Tennessee (USA)

4.881513.34

Top 25% authors in Tennessee (United States)

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[1]W Kip Viscusi

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

1.17
2[5]Jennifer F. Reinganum

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

3.92
3[3]Hans R. Stoll

Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

4.13
4[2]John J. Siegfried

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

4.53
5[8]Kamal Saggi

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

6.1
6[6]Peter Rousseau

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

6.14
7[4]Myrna Wooders

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

6.35
8[7]Eric W. Bond

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

6.39
9[11]Gregory W. Huffman

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

7.51
10[10]John Allan Weymark

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

7.71
11[13]David Parsley

Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

11.28
12[12]Benjamin Eden

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

11.48
13[14]Kevin X. D. Huang

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

13.74
14[15]Andrew F. Daughety

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

15.2
15[16]Mototsugu Shintani

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

15.67
16[17]Joni Hersch

15.94
17[18]Thomas H. McInish

Department of Economics, University of Memphis, Memphis

16.05
18[9]Mario John Crucini

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

16.78
19[19]John Patrick Conley

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

18.43
20[21]William J. Collins

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

18.71
21[24]Steven B Caudill

Department of Economics and Business Administration, Rhodes College, Memphis

20.6
22[20]Robert A. Driskill

Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

20.95
23[23]William Gary Christie

Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

21.42
24[27]Luke Froeb

Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville

21.68

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.