IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/sae/urbstu/v35y1998i9p1501-1517.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Institutions in British Property Research: A Review

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Eamonn D'Arcy & Geoffrey Keogh, 1999. "The Property Market and Urban Competitiveness: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 917-928, May.
  2. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2002. "Bridging the Divide? Complementary Perspectives on Property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1471-1478, July.
  3. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.
  4. Bossuyt, Daniël & Salet, Willem & Majoor, Stan, 2018. "Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 524-533.
  5. Tom Kauko, 2004. "Towards Infusing Institutions and Agency into House Price Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(8), pages 1507-1519, July.
  6. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2004. "Land Re-Use, Complexity And Actor-Networks: A Framework For Research," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2004-09, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
  7. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
  8. Michael Ball, 2002. "Cultural Explanation of Regional Property Markets: A Critique," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1453-1469, July.
  9. Ingrid Nappi-Choulet, 2006. "The Role and Behaviour of Commercial Property Investors and Developers in French Urban Regeneration: The Experience of the Paris Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1511-1535, August.
  10. David Adams & Chris Leishman & Craig Watkins, 2012. "Housebuilder Networks and Residential Land Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(4), pages 705-720, March.
  11. Nikolaos Triantafyllopoulos, 2008. "Does Land Property Structure Affect Local Development Patterns? Evidence from a Greek Tourist Area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(4), pages 797-824, April.
  12. Thierry Theurillat & Patrick Rérat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2015. "The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1414-1433, June.
  13. Michael Ball, 2003. "Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: An International Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 897-916, May.
  14. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  15. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
  16. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
  17. Olszewski, Robert & Pałka, Piotr & Wendland, Agnieszka & Majdzińska, Karolina, 2021. "Application of cooperative game theory in a spatial context: An example of the application of the community-led local development instrument for the decision support system of biogas plants constructi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
  18. C.M. Lizieri, 2003. "Occupier Requirements in Commercial Real Estate Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1151-1169, May.
  19. Barrie Needham & Arno Segeren & Edwin Buitelaar, 2011. "Institutions in Theories of Land Markets: Illustrated by the Dutch Market for Agricultural Land," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(1), pages 161-176, January.
  20. Rob Imrie & Peter Hall, 2001. "An Exploration of Disability and the Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 333-350, February.
  21. Simon C. Y. Chen, 2011. "Common Interest Development and the Changing Roles of Government and Market in Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(16), pages 3599-3612, December.
  22. Ho-Yin Yue, 2012. "Why housing price in Hong Kong? An explanation in game theory approach," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 8-15.
  23. Jieming Zhu, 2004. "From Land Use Right to Land Development Right: Institutional Change in China's Urban Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 1249-1267, June.
  24. repec:dgr:rugsom:02d31 is not listed on IDEAS
  25. Barrie Needham & George de Kam, 2004. "Understanding How Land is Exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and Transaction Costs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 2061-2076, September.
  26. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
  27. Callum Ward & Manuel B Aalbers, 2016. "Virtual special issue editorial essay: ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1760-1783, July.
  28. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
  29. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
  30. Simon Guy & John Henneberry & Steven Rowley, 2002. "Development Cultures and Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1181-1196, June.
  31. David Adams & Robert Croudace & Steve Tiesdell, 2012. "Exploring the ‘Notional Property Developer’ as a Policy Construct," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(12), pages 2577-2596, September.
  32. Michael White & Philip Allmendinger, 2003. "Land-use Planning and the Housing Market: A Comparative Review of the UK and the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 953-972, May.
  33. Kristian James Ruming, 2009. "Development Configurations and Planning Negotiations: A Case of Fringe Development in Sydney, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1461-1483, June.
  34. Kaihuai Liao & Rainer Wehrhahn & Werner Breitung, 2019. "Urban planners and the production of gated communities in China: A structure–agency approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2635-2653, October.
  35. Yakup Egercioglu, 2006. "The Effects of Property Relations on Urban Renewal Project," ERSA conference papers ersa06p34, European Regional Science Association.
  36. Geoffrey Keogh & Eamonn D'Arcy, 1999. "Property Market Efficiency: An Institutional Economics Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(13), pages 2401-2414, December.
  37. Susan J. Smith & Moira Munro & Hazel Christie, 2006. "Performing (Housing) Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 81-98, January.
  38. Pellenbarg, P.H. & Wissen, L.J.G. van & Dijk, J. van, 2002. "Firm relocation: state of the art and research prospects," Research Report 02D31, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
  39. Kauko Tom, 2019. "Institutions at the Interface of Urban Planning and Real Estate," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(3), pages 17-30, September.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.