IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/ehl/lserod/62303.html

The politics of trade agreement design: revisiting the depth-flexibility nexus

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Rodrigo Fagundes Cezar & Oto Murer Küll Montagner, 2024. "Reserving the right to say no? Equilibria around hard trade‐sustainability commitments in power‐asymmetric contexts," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 329-341, May.
  2. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
  3. Xing Yao & Yongzhong Zhang & Rizwana Yasmeen & Zhen Cai, 2021. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
  4. Kim, Dongin & Steinbach, Sandro & Zurita, Carlos, 2024. "Deep trade agreements and agri-food global value chain integration," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
  5. Sojun Park & Lauren C. Konken, 2025. "Exploiting treaty ambiguity: Public health exceptions in the WTO TRIPS agreement," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 547-574, September.
  6. Wen‐Chin Wu & Fangjin Ye, 2020. "Preferential Trade Agreements, Democracy, and the Risk of Coups d’état," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 1834-1849, September.
  7. Leonardo Baccini & Arianna Bondi & Matteo Fiorini, 2023. "Global Value Chains and the Design of Trade Agreements," RSCAS Working Papers 2013_56, European University Institute.
  8. Oliver Westerwinter, 2017. "Barbara Koremenos. 2016. The continent of international law. Explaining agreement design. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 647-651, December.
  9. Jörg Broschek, 2023. "Multilevel Trade Policy in the Joint‐Decision Trap? The Case of CETA," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 300-311.
  10. Manfred Elsig & Sebastian Klotz, 2021. "Digital Trade Rules in Preferential Trade Agreements: Is There a WTO Impact?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 25-36, May.
  11. Diana Panke & Sören Stapel, 2024. "Cooperation between international organizations: Demand, supply, and restraint," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 269-305, April.
  12. Oliver Westerwinter, 2021. "Transnational public-private governance initiatives in world politics: Introducing a new dataset," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 137-174, January.
  13. Huang, Der-Ting, 2026. "Why regional economic agreements matter more than multilateral and bilateral agreements: Evidence from trade and investment in East Asia," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
  14. Christoph Mödlhamer, 2020. "Innovativeness and the design of intellectual property rights in preferential trade agreements: A refinement of the North–South explanation," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 329-348, December.
  15. Eugénia C. Heldt & Laura C. Mahrenbach, 2019. "Rising Powers in Global Economic Governance: Mapping the Flexibility‐Empowerment Nexus," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 19-28, February.
  16. Tobias Lenz & Besir Ceka & Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks & Alexandr Burilkov, 2023. "Discovering cooperation: Endogenous change in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 631-666, October.
  17. Renee Bowen & Manfred Elsig, 2018. "Trade and investment: Introduction to the special issue," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 137-142, June.
  18. Zarlasht Razeq, . "Deep trade integration and North-South participation in global value chains," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  19. Jörg Broschek, 2023. "Multilevel Trade Policy in the Joint‐Decision Trap? The Case of CETA," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 300-311.
  20. Mwita Chacha & Adil Nussipov, 2022. "The Breadth–Depth Trade‐Off and Varieties of Preferential Trade Agreements," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 821-844, May.
  21. Markus Gastinger & Henning Schmidtke, 2023. "Measuring precision precisely: A dictionary-based measure of imprecision," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 553-571, July.
  22. Arianna Bondi & Leonardo Baccini & Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman & Carlo Altomonte & Italo Colantone, 2026. "Global value chains and the design of trade agreements," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 203-235, March.
  23. Berger, Axel & Brandi, Clara & Bruhn, Dominique & Chi, Manjiao, 2017. "Towards “greening” trade? Tracking environmental provisions in the preferential trade agreements of emerging markets," IDOS Discussion Papers 2/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  24. T. Renee Bowen & J. Lawrence Broz & Christina J. Schneider, 2026. "Domestic politics and international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-40, March.
  25. Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo & Antonio Sianes, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the COVID-19 Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
  26. Julian Hinz, 2023. "The ties that bind: geopolitical motivations for economic integration," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 159(1), pages 51-100, February.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.