IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/intfor/v27y2011i1p81-102.html

Judgmental aggregation strategies depend on whether the self is involved

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Ilan Yaniv & Shoham Choshen-Hillel, 2012. "When guessing what another person would say is better than giving your own opinion: Using perspective-taking to improve advice-taking," Discussion Paper Series dp622, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
  2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:5:p:491-499 is not listed on IDEAS
  3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:349-363 is not listed on IDEAS
  4. Jordan Tong & Daniel Feiler, 2017. "A Behavioral Model of Forecasting: Naive Statistics on Mental Samples," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3609-3627, November.
  5. repec:plo:pone00:0188825 is not listed on IDEAS
  6. Thomas Schultze & Andreas Mojzisch & Stefan Schulz-Hardt, 2019. "Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 349-363, May.
  7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:265-276 is not listed on IDEAS
  8. Thomas Schultze & Anne-Fernandine Rakotoarisoa & Stefan Schulz-Hardt, 2015. "Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(2), pages 144-171, March.
  9. Mandy Hütter & Fabian Ache, 2016. "Seeking advice: A sampling approach to advice taking," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(4), pages 401-415, July.
  10. Jaeseob Lim & Sang-Hun Lee, 2020. "Utility and use of accuracy cues in social learning of crowd preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
  11. Ammeling, Jonas & Aubreville, Marc & Fritz, Alexis & Kießig, Angelika & Krügel, Sebastian & Uhl, Matthias, 2025. "An interdisciplinary perspective on AI-supported decision making in medicine," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  12. Philipp Ecken & Richard Pibernik, 2016. "Hit or Miss: What Leads Experts to Take Advice for Long-Term Judgments?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 2002-2021, July.
  13. Logg, Jennifer M. & Minson, Julia A. & Moore, Don A., 2019. "Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 90-103.
  14. Önkal, Dilek & Sinan Gönül, M. & Goodwin, Paul & Thomson, Mary & Öz, Esra, 2017. "Evaluating expert advice in forecasting: Users’ reactions to presumed vs. experienced credibility," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 280-297.
  15. Yaron Shlomi, 2014. "Subjective integration of probabilistic information from experience and description," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9(5), pages 491-499, September.
  16. Peter Bednarik & Thomas Schultze, 2015. "The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(3), pages 265-276, May.
  17. Benedikt Berger & Martin Adam & Alexander Rühr & Alexander Benlian, 2021. "Watch Me Improve—Algorithm Aversion and Demonstrating the Ability to Learn," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(1), pages 55-68, February.
  18. Wright, George & Rowe, Gene, 2011. "Group-based judgmental forecasting: An integration of extant knowledge and the development of priorities for a new research agenda," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-13, January.
  19. Rader, Christina A. & Soll, Jack B. & Larrick, Richard P., 2015. "Pushing away from representative advice: Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 26-43.
  20. repec:eee:intfor:v:27:y:2011:i:1:p:1-13 is not listed on IDEAS
  21. repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:4:p:401-415 is not listed on IDEAS
  22. Allen, Ryan T. & Choudhury, Prithwiraj, 2021. "Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: the countervailing forces of ability and aversion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128784, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  23. Milyavsky, Maxim & Gvili, Yaniv, 2024. "Advice taking vs. combining opinions: Framing social information as advice increases source’s perceived helping intentions, trust, and influence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
  24. Chen Li & Ning Liu, 2021. "What to tell? Wise communication and wise crowd," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 279-299, March.
  25. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:144-171 is not listed on IDEAS
  26. Kausel, Edgar E. & Culbertson, Satoris S. & Leiva, Pedro I. & Slaughter, Jerel E. & Jackson, Alexander T., 2015. "Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 33-50.
  27. Louis Longin & Deisy Briceno & Oleksandra Poquet, 2025. "Data sharing in learning analytics: how context and group discussion influence the individual willingness to share," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.