IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Bemerkungen zur ökonomischen Analyse von Sicherheit

Listed author(s):
  • Budzinski, Oliver

This paper is a comment on the analysis of the German security industry by Stuchtey and Skrzypietz (2014). The comment focuses on two issues. Firstly, it argues that it is advantageous for the research agenda of the authors to conceptualize security as a human need and not as an economic good. The need for security, then, can be viewed to get satisfied by various goods (products and services including, inter alia, personal security and bodyguarding, security services, alarm and video surveillance equipment or antivirus software) that are partly offered by the German government and partly by private companies on competitive markets. Secondly, it suggests a slightly different theoretical framework in order to streamline both the conceptual thinking and the empirical analysis of the paper, in particular with a view to the issue of a postulated trend towards the privatization of security goods.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics in its series Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers with number 88.

in new window

Date of creation: 2014
Handle: RePEc:zbw:tuiedp:88
Contact details of provider: Postal:
(0049) (0)3677 69 4001

Phone: 0 36 77 / 69 - 40 30
Fax: (0049) (0)3677 69 4200
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tuiedp:88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.