IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/safewh/94.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quo vadis sustainable funds? Sustainability and taxonomy-aligned disclosure in Germany under the SFDR

Author

Listed:
  • Badenhoop, Nikolai
  • Hackmann, Angelina
  • Mücke, Christian
  • Pelizzon, Loriana

Abstract

This paper analyzes the current implementation status of sustainability and taxonomy-aligned disclosure under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), which aims to improve the classification of sustainability credentials of financial products and thereby prevent greenwashing. Moreover, it considers the development of the SFDR categorization of funds offered via banks in Germany between September 2022 and March 2023. Examining data provided by WM Gruppe, which consists of more than 10,000 investment funds and 2,000 index funds, we have observed a significant proportion of Article 9 (dark green) funds transitioning to the group of Article 8 (light green) funds, particularly among index funds. As a result of this process, the profile of the SFDR classes has sharpened, which is reflected in an increased share of sustainable investments in the group of Article 9 funds. When differentiating between environmental and social investments, the share of environmental investments has increased, but the share of social investments has decreased in the group of Article 9 funds at the beginning of 2023. The share of taxonomy-aligned investments is very low, but increases slightly for Article 9 funds. However, as of March 2023, only about 1,000 funds have reported their sustainability proportions, and this picture may change due to regulatory changes that will require all funds within the scope of the SFDR to report these proportions in their annual reports being published after 1 January 2023.

Suggested Citation

  • Badenhoop, Nikolai & Hackmann, Angelina & Mücke, Christian & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2023. "Quo vadis sustainable funds? Sustainability and taxonomy-aligned disclosure in Germany under the SFDR," SAFE White Paper Series 94, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:safewh:94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/273716/1/1854330292.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scheitza, Lisa & Busch, Timo, 2024. "SFDR Article 9: Is it all about impact?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    SFDR; Sustainabilty; Taxonomie; Disclosure; Sustainable Investments;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:safewh:94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csafede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.