IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/201602.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wirtschaftsethik der Rohstoffgewinnung: Vom Ressourcenfluch zur Governance nachhaltiger Entwicklung

Author

Listed:
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Dieser Aufsatz geht aus einer wirtschaftsethischen Perspektive der Frage nach, inwiefern es einen Ressourcenfluch gibt und mit Hilfe welcher institutionellen Vorkehrungen gegenwärtig versucht wird, armen Staaten, die über reiche Rohstoffvorkommen verfügen, eine nachhaltige Entwicklung zu ermöglichen. Die Argumentation gliedert sich gedanklich in 3 Schritte: (a) Ausgehend von Paul Colliers 5-Stufen-Modell wird erläutert, dass die nachhaltige Nutzung natürlicher Ressourcen ein „weakest-link“-Problem darstellt. So wird verständlich, dass Entwicklungsländer auf äußere Hilfe in Form von New-Governance-Initiativen angewiesen sind. (b) Sodann wird der Kimberley-Prozess als New-Governance-Initiative vorgestellt. Hier zeigen sich deutlich die Schwächen, die bei dem Versuch auftreten können, in trisektoraler Zusammenarbeit von staatlichen, wirtschaftlichen und zivilgesellschaftlichen Akteuren neue Regelsysteme mit verbesserten Anreizwirkungen ins Werk zu setzen. (c) Abschließend wird anhand von „EITI“ und anhand der „OECD Guidelines“ sowie anhand zahlreicher weiterer Initiativen gezeigt, wie gegenwärtig versucht wird, ein globales Regulierungsregime aufzubauen, das auf eine nachhaltige Entwicklung zielt.

Suggested Citation

  • Pies, Ingo, 2016. "Wirtschaftsethik der Rohstoffgewinnung: Vom Ressourcenfluch zur Governance nachhaltiger Entwicklung," Discussion Papers 2016-02, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/170449/1/dp2016-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Barrett & Carlo Carraro & Jaime de Melo, 2015. "Towards a Workable and Effective Climate Regime," Review of Environment, Energy and Economics - Re3, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Melo, Jaime & Solleder, Jean-Marc, 2020. "Barriers to trade in environmental goods: How important they are and what should developing countries expect from their removal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Thomas F. STOCKER, 2015. "Implications of Climate Science for Negotiators," Working Papers P135, FERDI.
    3. Thomas F. STOCKER, 2015. "Implications of Climate Science for Negotiators," Working Papers P135, FERDI.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ressourcenfluch; nachhaltige Entwicklung; New Governance; EITI; Kimberley-Prozess; OECD Guidelines; Resource Curse; Sustainable Development; New Governance; EITI; Kimberley process; OECD Guidelines;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:201602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.