IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kitwps/320438.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of the 2025 Bundestag elections. Part 2 of 4: Representativeness of the parties and the Bundestag

Author

Listed:
  • Tanguiane, Andranick S.

Abstract

This is the second out of four papers on the 2025 German federal elections continuing our analysis of the 2009, 2013, 2017 and 2021 Bundestag elections. We estimate the policy representation ability of the 29 parties that participated in the 2025 elections and of the 2025 Bundestag. For this purpose, the parties' Yes/No answers to 38 topical questions are compared with the results of recent public opinion polls. Then the party indices of popularity (the average percentage of the population represented) and universality (frequency in representing a majority) are constructed. Assuming that the Bundestag position on the 38 issues is determined by the Bundestag majority, the Bundestag indices of popularity and universality are estimated as well. The main conclusion is that the representativeness of the parties in the Bundestag and the Bundestag as a whole (before coalition-formation) has significantly decreased since 2021. In particular, the former election winner, the SPD, is now ranked 16 instead of 4 in 2021, having the mean index (popularity + universality)/ 2 = 56.3% instead of 65 % in 2021, and the mean index of the Bundestag is now equal to 48.5% instead of the former 61.1%. As for the currently ruling coalition of the CDU/CSU + SPD, its compatibility of 52.8% is greater than that of the former ruling coalition of the SPD + GRÜNE + FDP1, which was equal to 45% (which resulted in the coalition collapse). The mean representativeness index of the current ruling coalition is however significantly lower (51.5% compared with the former 61%).

Suggested Citation

  • Tanguiane, Andranick S., 2025. "Analysis of the 2025 Bundestag elections. Part 2 of 4: Representativeness of the parties and the Bundestag," Working Paper Series in Economics 168, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kitwps:320438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/320438/1/1930063962.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Policy representation; representative democracy; direct democracy; elections; coalitions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kitwps:320438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwkitde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.