IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kdifor/v261y2015p1-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Future Direction of Job Creation Programs in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Yong-seong

Abstract

- This paper aims to overview the current state of the government-funded job creation programs and then to discuss the programs' future direction for an effective improvement in the employment rate based on international comparison and empirical analysis. - The government's budget for the job creation programs has steadily increased in recent years to reach KRW 11.8 trillion (based on the budget plan) in 2014. - By sub-program related to the active labor market policy, Korea's budget spending was overwhelmingly concentrated on direct job creation (67.3 percent in 2010) while the spending was relatively minuscule on vocational/education training (17.2 percent) and employment services (2.7 percent). - In contrast, OECD countries spent a greater amount on vocational/education training and employment services (28.5 percent on average in 2010) than on direct job creation (12.5 percent on average). - An empirical analysis on the short- and medium-term effects of active labor market policy using OECD country data shows the following: - Employment subsidies and direct job creation worked to raise the employment rate in the short-term while the medium-term effects were not confirmed. Of note, direct job creation was found to have negative effects in the medium-term. - Employment services and vocational/education training helped boost the employment rate in the medium- to long-term. - A review on the reallocation of current budget for the job creation programs is necessary. - The government needs to gradually cut the spending share on direct job creation, whose medium- to long-term effects are in question. - Instead, it would be ideal for the government to shift the focus of its financial resource allocation over to employment services and vocational/education training, on which it currently spends relatively little. - To boost female employment rate, expansion of part-time work and more effective child care policy is needed. - OECD country data shows that the larger the proportion of part-time employees there are in a market, the higher the female employment rate tends to be. In addition, child care policy is considered a key determinant of a country's female employment rate. - Therefore, the government needs to improve its policy efforts to increase penetration of flexible part-time employment and to support the work-family life balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Yong-seong, 2015. "Future Direction of Job Creation Programs in Korea," KDI Policy Forum 261, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifor:v:261:y:2015:p:1-10
    DOI: 10.22740/kdi.forum.e.2015.261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200905/1/kdi-pol-forum-261.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22740/kdi.forum.e.2015.261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eichhorst, Werner, 2015. "Low Pay as an Alternative to Public Direct Job Creation? Lessons from the German Case," IZA Policy Papers 99, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifor:v:261:y:2015:p:1-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kdiiikr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.