IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Married Women's Continued Participation in the Labor Market and Childbirth: Relevant Factors and Policy Implications


  • Kim, Inkyung


- This study analyzes the impact of work-family balance policies and men's contribution in the home to women's continued economic activities and the fertility rate, and explores policy measures that can lessen the burden incurred by women due to career breaks and having children. - Empirical analysis results show that the work-family balance policies and men's participation in the home are strongly correlated to women's continued career and plans for children. - In terms of the average marginal effect, the provision of maternity leave increases the probability of children by 3.0%p while that of parental leave increases the likelihood of women continuing to participate in the labor market by 4.0%p. - Compared to full-time workers, voluntary and non-voluntary part-time workers are 5.8%p and 4.9%p less likely to continue with their economic activities while only voluntary workers are 2.0%p more likely to have children. - A 50%p increase in the proportion of husband's housework hours in the couple's total raises the probability of women continuing their careers by 3.5%p. - To improve the accessibility of programs, the coverage rate of employment insurance must be expanded as well as 'smart labor inspections' and consultation services. - Currently, only insured workers are entitled to paid maternity/parental leave and reduced working hours for childcare. - The government should actively engage in promoting the available systems that can assist uninsured workers to obtain benefits. Also, more labor services should be provided that offer consultation services for possible problems and difficulties incurred during the use of the programs. - Smart labor inspections investigate workplaces suspected of failing to provide proper support to insured pregnant female employees and their families. - Employers should be provided with the knowhow on assigning specialized tasks to existing employees and finding replacements to handle the remaining duties. - In order to enhance men's participation in the home, bonuses for men taking parental leave and increasing the income replacement ratio for shorter leaves should be considered. - At present, men cannot receive their bonuses even if they are taking parental leave instead of their spouses because they are uninsured or refused by their employers. - Another measure that is worth consideration is increasing the income replacement ratio for men taking shorter parental leave based on the fact that men expect higher income security during leave and usually take shorter parental leave than women.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Inkyung, 2018. "Married Women's Continued Participation in the Labor Market and Childbirth: Relevant Factors and Policy Implications," KDI Policy Forum 268, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifor:268
    DOI: 10.22740/

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Yhesaem Park & Almas Heshmati, 2019. "The Effects of Labor Market Characteristics on Women’s Poverty in Korea," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifor:268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.