IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iwqwdp/032013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation in generalized polynomial autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models

Author

Listed:
  • Tinkl, Fabian

Abstract

In this article, consistency and asymptotic normality of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator (QMLE) in the class of polynomial augmented generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models (GARCH) is proven. The result extends the results of the standard GARCH model to the class of polynomial augmented GARCH models which contains many commonly employed GARCH models as special cases. The results are obtained under mild conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tinkl, Fabian, 2013. "Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation in generalized polynomial autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 03/2013, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics, revised 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iwqwdp:032013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/73143/1/745263119.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leucht, Anne & Neumann, Michael H. & Kreiss, Jens-Peter, 2013. "A model specification test for GARCH(1,1) processes," Working Papers 13-11, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
    2. Anne Leucht & Jens-Peter Kreiss & Michael H. Neumann, 2015. "A Model Specification Test For GARCH(1,1) Processes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1167-1193, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    asymptotic normality; consistency; polynomial augmented GARCH models; quasi-maximum likelihood estimation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iwqwdp:032013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vierlde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.