IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ieadps/314020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fraud focus: Is the Serious Fraud Office fit for purpose?

Author

Listed:
  • Forder, James

Abstract

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) performs the important tasks of investigating and prosecuting serious and complex fraud in England and Wales. Since its creation in 1988 its record of successful prosecutions has been unsatisfactory. It has been markedly mistake-prone and there have been too many instances of inappropriate or unprofessional behaviour. The appropriateness of its use of 'deferred prosecution agreements' (DPAs) as an alternative to prosecution needs careful scrutiny. Part of the explanation of the SFO's poor performance lies in the unavoidable complexity of the cases it has to handle, and various reforms to law or procedure should be considered. The inappropriate behaviour that has occurred is unacceptable and appears to require a change of culture, and therefore, perhaps, a broad institutional reorganisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Forder, James, 2023. "Fraud focus: Is the Serious Fraud Office fit for purpose?," IEA Discussion Papers 120, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ieadps:314020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/314020/1/iea-dp120.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosalind Wright, 2003. "Fraud after Roskill: a view from the Serious Fraud Office," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 10-16, December.
    2. Steven Toms, 2019. "Financial scandals: a historical overview," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 477-499, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cronin, Alison, 2024. "Fixing fraud: Flaws in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act and the current enforcement approach," IEA Discussion Papers 129, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ballantine, Joan & Boyce, Gordon & Stoner, Greg, 2024. "A critical review of AI in accounting education: Threat and opportunity," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Yousaf, Imran & Riaz, Yasir & Goodell, John W, 2023. "What do responses of financial markets to the collapse of FTX say about investor interest in cryptocurrencies? Event-study evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Hussein Ali Mroueh, 2024. "The Role of Financial Audit in the Corporate Governance Process: An In-depth Analysis," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 36-42.
    4. Yunchuan Sun & Xiaoping Zeng & Ying Xu & Hong Yue & Xipu Yu, 2024. "An intelligent detecting model for financial frauds in Chinese A‐share market," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 1110-1136, July.
    5. Saeid Homayoun & Vahid Molla Imeny & Mahdi Salehi & Mahdi Moradi & Simon Norton, 2022. "Which Is More Concerning for Accounting Professionals-Personal Risk or Professional Risk?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Noel, Michael D. & Osman, Syed M.I., 2024. "Bank scandal contagion: Evidence from the Wells Fargo cross-selling scandal," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Ivanka Vranic & Veljko Samardzic & Tatjana Davidov & Zeljko Grubljesic & Slobodan Popovic, 2021. "Significance Of Consideration Of Internal Control And Internal Audit In The Business Of Companies That Need To Implement The Implementation Mentioned Within The Accounting Policy Of The Company," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 37-44, June.
    8. Jonathan A. Batten & Igor LonČarski & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2022. "Financial Market Manipulation, Whistleblowing, and the Common Good: Evidence from the LIBOR Scandal," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(1), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Ani Wilujeng Suryani & Fiki Fernando, 2024. "“Don’t Be a Bragger!”: Social Media Impression and Firm’s Financial Performance," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 157-171, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ieadps:314020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieaaauk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.