IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/idospb/340865.html

Strengthening European development policy: The case for team Europe 2.0

Author

Listed:
  • Koch, Svea
  • Bergmann, Julian
  • Erforth, Benedikt
  • Hackenesch, Christine
  • Keijzer, Niels

Abstract

The international order is undergoing profound change as rivalry among major powers realigns the global balance. This is also having an impact on European development policy. In many European Union (EU) member states, funding for official development assistance (ODA) is declining. At the same time, EU countries are reforming their development policies and increasingly channelling their remaining resources towards priorities that serve primarily their own interests. So far, these reforms have largely been defined bilaterally, whereas a political debate on the role, added value and joint objectives of EU development policy is largely absent. Yet, without strengthening European cooperation in development policy, Europe will not succeed in providing an adequate response to the current upheavals in global politics. In this policy brief, we argue that reform efforts in European development policy must strengthen cooperation and complementarity to respond effectively to the changed geopolitical landscape. Our analysis identifies four key policy areas where European actors are pursuing ongoing reforms and where development policy should make significant contributions: 1) promoting economic cooperation and privatesector engagement, 2) security policy, 3) managing and shaping migration and 4) human development including poverty reduction, particularly in least developed countries (LDCs). So far, a joint European strategic direction in these areas has been lacking. Negotiating these shared priorities requires a revitalisation of the political dialogue between EU institutions and member states, as well as further development of the "Team Europe" approach. "Team Europe 2.0" would then have two functions: to strengthen substantive complementarity "internally" through an understanding of how the various actors individually contribute to jointly defined objectives; and "externally" by making visible what Europe stands for strategically. A key element of Team Europe 2.0 should be an improved substantive dialogue among member states and within issue-specific, informal groups cofacilitated by individual member states and the European Commission. Such "thematic champions" could initiate the development of joint strategies for larger, transformative initiatives. Improved political dialogue and coordination on substance in key areas of European development policy are prerequisites for a united and more strategic external presence of "Team Europe", including in multilateral contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Koch, Svea & Bergmann, Julian & Erforth, Benedikt & Hackenesch, Christine & Keijzer, Niels, 2026. "Strengthening European development policy: The case for team Europe 2.0," IDOS Policy Briefs 11/2026, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:idospb:340865
    DOI: 10.23661/ipb11.2026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/340865/1/1969839570.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/ipb11.2026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisbeth Aggestam & Federica Bicchi, 2019. "New Directions in EU Foreign Policy Governance: Cross‐loading, Leadership and Informal Groupings," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 515-532, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helena Farrand Carrapico & George Christou, 2026. "All in this Together? Communities of Practice in UK–EU Cybersecurity Relations Post‐Brexit and Differentiated Re‐engagement," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(1), pages 413-430, January.
    2. Jan Orbie & Viktor Opsomer & Yentyl Williams & Sarah Delputte & Joren Verschaeve, 2021. "Shielded against risk? European donor co‐ordination in Palestine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 703-720, September.
    3. Jane Freedman, 2021. "Immigration, Refugees and Responses," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 92-102, September.
    4. Heidi Maurer & Nicholas Wright, 2021. "Still Governing in the Shadows? Member States and the Political and Security Committee in the Post‐Lisbon EU Foreign Policy Architecture," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 856-872, July.
    5. Helene Sjursen & Federica Bicchi & Marianna Lovato, 2026. "Keep on Talking! The Resilience of Multilateral Communications in EU Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 1175-1189, May.
    6. Patryk Czułno, 2021. "Theorizing and Testing Cross‐Loading: The EU Common Foreign and Security Policy and Polish Concessions to Germany's Russia Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1247-1266, September.
    7. Matteo CM Casiraghi & Eugenio Cusumano & Angelos Chryssogelos, 2024. "European integration and political party logos: A ‘visual Europeanization’?," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(1), pages 86-105, March.
    8. Magnus Schoeller & Emil Wieringa Hildebrand & Olof Karlsson, 2024. "Explaining the Leadership Vacuum: Germany, the completion of the Banking Union and arms deliveries to Ukraine," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 1, Institute for European integration research (EIF).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:idospb:340865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.