IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/330.html

A Comment on "Friendship and female education: Evidence from a field experiment in Bangladeshi primary schools" by Hahn et al

Author

Listed:
  • Bensch, Gunther
  • Rose, Julian
  • Ankel-Peters, Jörg
  • Brodeur, Abel

Abstract

Hahn et al. (2020), published in the Economic Journal, evaluate a treatment randomized across 115 Bangladeshi primary schools that assigned students to study for one week either in groups of friends or with randomly picked peers. They find that the friends treatment improves math performance, but only among low-ability girls. We identify four sets of unresolved discrepancies: inconsistent accounts of implementation responsibilities, irregularities in the sample and group structure, misalignments between reported procedures and observed data, and implausible missing-data and attendance patterns. Taken together, these issues go beyond reporting imperfections and reveal multiple discrepancies between the published record, earlier versions of the study, the replication data, and the authors’ two subsequent replies. These unresolved discrepancies preclude independent verification of material aspects of the study record and raise serious questions about the reliability of the reported findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Bensch, Gunther & Rose, Julian & Ankel-Peters, Jörg & Brodeur, Abel, 2026. "A Comment on "Friendship and female education: Evidence from a field experiment in Bangladeshi primary schools" by Hahn et al," I4R Discussion Paper Series 330, The Institute for Replication (I4R), revised 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/344068.2/1/330-I4R-Bensch-Rose-Ankel-Peters-Brodeur-Update.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:i4rdps:330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.i4replication.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.