Author
Listed:
- Rossouw, Stephanie
- Greyling, Talita
Abstract
Social capital is widely recognised as a determinant of subjective well-being (SWB), yet most studies rely on a narrow set of indicators. Typically, the association between generalised trust and civic participation and a single evaluative well-being measure is explored, mainly in Western countries. Using Waves 1 and 2 data from the Global Flourishing Study, we test whether these conventional social capital indicators are the most important predictors for two different evaluative well-being measures: life satisfaction and the Cantril ladder. Additionally, we use economic measures as a benchmark, given that traditionally it has been among the principal indicators and most extensively discussed correlates of SWB, to compare the predictive importance of three social capital dimensions or blocks across measures and development contexts, i.e., Western countries and the Global South. We employ XGBoost models and SHAP values, normalised for cross-sample differences in the dispersion of the outcome variables, to rank predictors. A sequential Pseudo-R² decomposition is used as a scale-free robustness validation, and panel fixed-effects models with standardised coefficients are used to assess which relationships survive within-person identification. We find that the conventional social capital indicators, civic engagement and general trust, used predominantly in the literature, perform poorly. The two variables add little to both SWB measures across all samples (Western and Global South) and, in several specifications, worsen out-of-sample prediction. Among the social capital blocks (dimensions), belonging, driven by satisfaction with close relationships, is the only dimension that exceeds economic variables, and it does so only for life satisfaction, not for the Cantril ladder. In the Global South, material challenges have the largest standardised within-person association with life satisfaction (ß = -0.213) and exceed all social capital variables. In Western countries, satisfaction with relationships dominates (ß = 0.204). The Pseudo-R² decomposition shows the same broad block-level pattern, and the fixed-effects estimates further indicate that the main relationships are also evident within persons over time. Our findings indicate that conclusions about the importance of social capital depend on which dimension (and indicators) of social capital is measured, which SWB outcome is used, and in which region the analysis is conducted.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
- D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
- Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.