IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Brand Switching Fraction of Promotion Effects: Unit Sales Versus Elasticity Decompositions

Listed author(s):
  • Dick Wittink


    (School of Management)

  • Sachin Gupta


    (Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management)

  • Harald J. van Heerde


    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

Registered author(s):

    Several researchers have decomposed sales promotion elasticities. A key result is that the majority of the sales promotion elasticity, about 74 percent on average, is purportedly due to secondary demand effects (brand switching) and the remainder is due to primary demand effects (timing acceleration and quantity increases). However, studies of unit sales effects suggest that the cross-brand sales effects together are less than half of the own-brand sales effect. Hence, there appears to be a dramatic difference between the relative size of the secondary demand effect based on the one hand on a decomposition of elasticities and on the other hand on a decomposition of unit sales effects. We explore the reason for this paradox and, since the research literature focuses on elasticities, we derive analytical expressions that relate the decomposition of unit sales effects to the elasticity decomposition. We apply these expressions to obtain estimated unit sales effect decompositions from previously reported elasticity decomposition results. We show why the elasticity-based decomposition is not interpretable as a unit sales decomposition, and we find that the unit sales brand switching component is much less than what the elasticity decomposition suggests. Instead of being about 74 percent, it is at most 33 percent on average. Thus, brand switching accounts for a far smaller percent of the unit sales promotion effect than what published results suggest.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Yale School of Management in its series Yale School of Management Working Papers with number ysm222.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 09 Sep 2001
    Handle: RePEc:ysm:somwrk:ysm222
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ysm:somwrk:ysm222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.