IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yon/wpaper/2018rwp-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Econometric Identification of Abnormally Low Bids in Procurement Market: Discriminant Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jinook Jeong

    (Yonsei University)

  • Hyunwoo Lee

    (Yonsei University)

Abstract

In the public construction procurement market, 'abnormally low bids (ALB)' are prevalent and they cause many social and economic problems. Also, when the procurement bids are colluded, ALB make the competitive price systematically underestimated. As many countries regulate ALB, their criteria to identify ALB are not homogenous. Most of the criteria are based on construction cost, which is usually inaccurate, vulnerable to accounting manipulation, and limited to the supply side information of the market. We propose an econometric identification process of ALB using a discriminant analysis. It is based on a switching regression with incomplete separation information and easily estimable by MLE. Through a Monte Carlo simulation, we show that our new method works well. We apply our method to Korean public construction bidding data from 2007 to 2016. The estimation results identify the determinants of the bid prices, along with the determinants of ALB, and presents a more accurate assessment of the collusion damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinook Jeong & Hyunwoo Lee, 2018. "An Econometric Identification of Abnormally Low Bids in Procurement Market: Discriminant Analysis," Working papers 2018rwp-129, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2018rwp-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://121.254.254.220/repec/yon/wpaper/2018rwp-129.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    abnormally low bids; discriminant analysis; public procurement market;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L70 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yon:wpaper:2018rwp-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: YERI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eryonkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.