IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment Of The Effect Of An External Factor For Dwelling Occupants’ Satisfaction: Access To Basic Activities


  • Gökhan Berk


Most approaches in housing research are based on a static perception of the dwelling, occupant and its environment. However, the increasing population settled in a dense urban environment with an increasing complexity of movement and mobility requires more sophisticated approaches than that are currently used. In an attempt to evaluate occupants’ perceptions related to compulsory urban mobility and their effects extending to housing satisfaction, a set of researches has been conducted. The aim and the focus of this paper has been to assess the validity of attempts to compose a consolidated indicator to measure the aspects related to that mobility. The significance of the indicator is tested through its incorporation in various housing user satisfaction researches. The results showed that there is a correlation between the home and environment satisfaction levels and the higher grades for the indicator defined as “access to basic activities (ABA) indicator”. The vice-versa was also affirmative. One conclusion is that dwelling occupants’ easy / enjoyable temporal mobility targeting basic activities would increase housing satisfaction as a greater portion of this mobility originates from or ends up in dwelling. Further analysis of the findings may provide hints for avoiding occupants’ dissatisfaction with less dependence on complex, large scale and major physical interventions to existing housing stock and to its environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Gökhan Berk, 2004. "Assessment Of The Effect Of An External Factor For Dwelling Occupants’ Satisfaction: Access To Basic Activities," Urban/Regional 0402002, EconWPA.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpur:0402002 Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on win98; to print on hp845c;

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan, 1990. "Comparative Advantage and Long-run Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(4), pages 796-815, September.
    2. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    3. Paul Cheshire & G. Carbonaro, 1996. "Urban Economic Growth in Europe: Testing Theory and Policy Prescriptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1111-1128, August.
    4. N. Gregory Mankiw & David Romer & David N. Weil, 1992. "A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 107(2), pages 407-437.
    5. Ulf Rosner & Joachim Weimann, 2003. "Die ökonomischen Effekte der Hochschulförderung des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt – Direkte Monetäre Effekte der Otto-von-Guericke- Universität Magdeburg und der Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (FH) (Teil 1)," Urban/Regional 0309002, EconWPA.
    6. Lorenz Blume & Oliver Fromm, 2000. "Wissenstransfer zwischen Universitäten und regionaler Wirtschaft: eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der Universität Gesamthochschule Kassel," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(1), pages 109-123.
    7. Bode, Eckhardt, 1998. "Lokale Wissensdiffusion und regionale Divergenz in Deutschland," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1038, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
    8. Lockett, Andy & Wright, Mike & Franklin, Stephen, 2003. "Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 185-200, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item



    JEL classification:

    • R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpur:0402002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.