IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwppe/0302007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Basic Income confronted with some popular ideas of justice

Author

Listed:
  • Loek Groot

    (SISWO/The Netherlands Institute for the Social Sciences)

Abstract

The difficulty of returning to (near) full employment and especially the high incidence of unemployment at the bottom side of the labour market these days, has inspired economists to make various policy proposals. Almost all measures actually applied maintain or even intensify the conditional nature of social security arrangements. The implementation of a substantial basic income (BI) would engender a major shift in social and economic policy. Even if the BI proposal proves to be economically feasible and sustainable, it would nevertheless not be a serious alternative to present social security systems as long as some popular objections against the proposal cannot be refuted or attenuated. In this chapter, the BI proposal has been confronted with the demands of self-reliance (self-maintenance, self-support, independence), reciprocity and the perfectionist and neutral work ethic.

Suggested Citation

  • Loek Groot, 2003. "Basic Income confronted with some popular ideas of justice," Public Economics 0302007, EconWPA.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0302007
    Note: Type of Document - Word (PC); prepared on IBM PC - PC-TEX/UNIX Sparc TeX; pages: 20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/pe/papers/0302/0302007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/pe/papers/0302/0302007.doc.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econwpa.repec.org/eps/pe/papers/0302/0302007.ps.gz
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    basic income justice;

    JEL classification:

    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • H - Public Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwppe:0302007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: http://econwpa.repec.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.