Report on Curriculum Reform at the National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam
The National Economics University (NEU) has undergone dramatic changes in the 1990s. It has expanded from teaching a few thousand students annually to teaching tens of thousands in 1998. At the same time, the subject matter being taught has changed. Economics under central planning was very different from the economics of market economies. A third aspect of change, although this has moved less quickly, has been changes in the method of teaching to adopt more of the “Western model” of library-focused and research-based learning. After a decade of reform, the NEU can count many achievements, but many challenges remain. This report is an input into that ongoing reform process. The report is based on a survey of all the departments and faculties of the NEU, and has incorporated the thoughts and opinions of the many people who contributed to that survey, and who have discussed reform issues with the authors over the past year. It is a synthesis of all their ideas, although the recommendations, and responsibility for them, are those of the authors. The report begins by profiling the changes which have occurred at the NEU since 1986, and then the present organisational and teaching structure (chapter one). This provides the descriptive background for the subsequent analysis. We then focus on the challenges of the ongoing transition process for the NEU (chapter two). These are divided into two basic types: ·Physical constraints (human and physical resources), and; ·Institutional reform (teaching methods, research focus, course structures and content). Throughout the analysis we draw upon the survey results, although reform recommendations not covered in previous chapters are discussed in appendix one. The final chapter draws together the recommendations and conclusions to suggest some “next steps” for the curriculum reform process at the NEU.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0110003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.