The Economic Consequences of Weintraub's Consumption Coefficient
In Michal Kalecki's work, aggregate profits are shown to be the sum of gross investment, the government budget deficit, the export surplus, and the difference between capitalist consumption and worker savings. In his 1979 paper, Weintraub suggested that the consumption coefficient, the ratio of total consumption to worker income, be used to generalize Kalecki's profit function by allowing the difference between capitalist consumption and worker savings to be expressed as a function of worker income. This generalization allows some post Keynesian assumptions (such as capitalist consumption equals worker savings and workers do not save and/or capitalists do not consume) to be dropped. Mair, Laramie, and Toporowski show that while use of the consumption coefficient simplifies and adds analytical precision to Kalecki's analysis, it does so at the cost of a loss of eliminating one of the dynamic channels of Kalecki's analysis, namely, the relationship between aggregate profits and capitalist marginal propensity to consume. They show the costs and benefits of using the consumption coefficient by outlining Kalecki's original model and including the consumption coefficient in order to analyze the effect of Weintraub's contribution to Kalecki's post Keynesian framework.
|Date of creation:||15 Jun 1999|
|Note:||Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 25; figures: included|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://econwpa.repec.org|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Anthony J. Laramie, 1991. "Taxation and Kalecki's Distribution Factors," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 583-594, July.
- Mair, Douglas & Laramie, Anthony J, 1992. "The Incidence of Business Rates on Manufacturing Industry in Scotland and the Rest of the UK," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 39(1), pages 76-94, February.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9906004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.