IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Biennial Budgeting for the Federal Government: Lessons from the States

Listed author(s):
  • Charles Whalen

    (The Jerome Levy Economics Institute)

Registered author(s):

    Proposals that would establish a two-year budget and appropriations cycle for the U.S. government have been offered by both Democrats and Republicans in recent years. This article analyzes the potential impact on such budgeting. The first section examines the budget period in theory and practice. The second section introduces federal biennial- budgeting proposals and the core arguments offered in support of this reform. The next three sections draw heavily on studies of state budgeting -- including a new biennial-budgeting survey prepared by the state of New Jersey -- to evaluate these arguments. The article concludes the federal budget process can be structure in a way that permits the advantages of biennial budgeting to outweigh its disadvantages.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Macroeconomics with number 9810008.

    in new window

    Length: 37 pages
    Date of creation: 29 Oct 1998
    Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9810008
    Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 37; figures: included
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Rivlin, Alice M, 1984. "Reform of the Budget Process," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 133-137, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9810008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.