IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimum Population -- A New Look: A Hamiltonian Approach Towards A Dynamic Analysis


  • Farasat Bokhari

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • George W. McCarthy

    (Bard College)


The current optimum population models found in economic literature define static optimum population used in forming policy i.e. at a given instant what should be the optimum number of people in a (closed) economy. We believe that although this definition is useful, it is very limiting as far as policy implications are concerned. When making policies, we are hardly concerned with what should be the absolute number of people in the country at any given time, for the parameters are ever changing. Especially so, if the optimum population is defined via market conditions. As an effort to improve these models, we define dynamic optimum population, or the optimum population growth trajectory. Our model, therefore deals with population growth rather than the absolute level of population. This gives a dynamic goal (and a more realistic one) to the policy makers and discussions can be held in familiar language once again, 'we want to decrease/increase the population growth to .... .' This paper applies Hamilton's principle of least action to find optimum control trajectories of population and net consumption. This is done using a neoclassical economic growth model using capital stock, net national income and investment in the equations of motion to maximize social welfare. The major difference between our model and any previous work is that welfare is not maximized only at one period thus defining a static optimum, but rather over an entire range of periods thus defining optimum population and consumption control trajectories which maximize social welfare and are used for policy analysis. We analyze some of the more popular population policies in light of our model. These policies have been divided into two categories: long-run and short-run. More specifically, in the long-run, policies are ascribed to control the endogenous factor, population growth. In the short-run, the policy implications are to try and control other variables in the economy so that the natural growth of the population, now an exogenous factor, is the optimum growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Farasat Bokhari & George W. McCarthy, 1996. "Optimum Population -- A New Look: A Hamiltonian Approach Towards A Dynamic Analysis," Labor and Demography 9607002, EconWPA.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:9607002
    Note: Type of Document - Postscript created from EXP V4; prepared on AT&T PC; to print on PostScript/ HP Laser Jet Si III and 4; pages: 32 ; figures: None needed. This paper is adapted from Farasat Bokhari's senior thesis (1993) at Bard College. It was presented to the Population Association of America at The Annual Conference Miami, Florida May 6, 1994.

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Smith, Clifford Jr. & Watts, Ross L., 1992. "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 263-292, December.
    2. George Baker & Michael Gibbs & Bengt Holmstrom, 1994. "The Wage Policy of a Firm," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 109(4), pages 921-955.
    3. Bruce A. Rayton & Jonathan S. Seaton, 1999. "The size of employee stakeholding in large UK corporations," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(5), pages 259-266.
    4. Bhargava, Sandeep, 1994. "Profit-Sharing and the Financial Performance of Companies: Evidence from U.K. Panel Data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 104(426), pages 1044-1056, September.
    5. Nalbantian, Haig R & Schotter, Andrew, 1997. "Productivity under Group Incentives: An Experimental Study," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(3), pages 314-341, June.
    6. Bruce Rayton, 1997. "Rent-sharing or incentives? Estimating the residual claim of average employees," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(12), pages 725-728.
    7. Coughlan, Anne T. & Schmidt, Ronald M., 1985. "Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance : An empirical investigation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-3), pages 43-66, April.
    8. Jensen, Michael C & Murphy, Kevin J, 1990. "Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(2), pages 225-264, April.
    9. Abowd, John M, 1989. "The Effect of Wage Bargains on the Stock Market Value of the Firm," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(4), pages 774-800, September.
    10. Ichniowski, Casey & Shaw, Kathryn & Prennushi, Giovanna, 1997. "The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(3), pages 291-313, June.
    11. Douglas L. Kruse, 1993. "Profit Sharing: Does It Make a Difference?," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number ps, November.
    12. George Baker & Michael Gibbs & Bengt Holmstrom, 1994. "The Internal Economics of the Firm: Evidence from Personnel Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 109(4), pages 881-919.
    13. Eggertsson,Thrainn, 1990. "Economic Behavior and Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521348911, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Optimum Population; Hamiltonian; Social Welfare; Population Policies; Preferences; Neoclassical Economic Growth Mode;

    JEL classification:

    • J10 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - General
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:9607002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.