On Examples, Counterexamples, and Proof by Example
This note is motivated by two seemingly unrelated items that have recently appeared in the Pi Mu Epsilon Journal (http://www.wpi.edu/~pme/journal.html). In one, the editor of the Journal wrote of "mathematical cranks" and how frustratingly difficult it can be sometimes to get would-be "circle-squarers" and "angle- trisectors" to see the errors in their "proofs." The first part of this paper illustrates--by way of example!--how futile is a "proof" that is attempted with one or more examples. The second part of the paper follows up on a recent article in the PME Journal, "How Economists Use Mathematics to Show Why Some People Work So Much For So Little," and shows that the author's result is a consequence of the special characteristics of the Cobb-Douglas utility function.
|Date of creation:||12 Jul 1996|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||Type of Document - Tex; prepared on IBM PC; to print on HP;|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://econwpa.repec.org|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:9607001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.