IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Verification, Validation and Evaluation of Expert Systems in Order to Develop a Safe Support in the Process of Decision Making


  • Adrian Cojocariu

    (Tibiscus University Timisoara, Romania)

  • Alin Munteanu

    (Tibiscus University Timisoara, Romania)

  • Ofelia Sofran

    (Tibiscus University Timisoara, Romania)


Expert systems use computational techniques that involve making decisions, just as human experts do, but it is well known that human experts may be wrong from time to time. We used to think that designing and using an expert system will solve this problem, but unfortunately expert systems can also be wrong, although the system contains no errors, but the knowledge on which the system is based, even if it is the best available, does not offer an answer, or the right answer for any situation. A wrong answer might cause a lot of harm if the system in question is one for medical use, or a management decision support. If the person using the system has no experience or solid knowledge about the area the system has been designed for, he or she will not be able to judge the accuracy of the given advice. Considering that real-world knowledge bases may contain a large number of rules, there will be a very large number of computational paths through an expert system, and each one of them will have to pass a test of correctness. More than ever, the risk management will be an important part of the entire process of the system’s project planning and management. For these reasons it is important for the software engineering expert to make sure the validation, verification and evaluation of the system are made at their best.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Cojocariu & Alin Munteanu & Ofelia Sofran, 2005. "Verification, Validation and Evaluation of Expert Systems in Order to Develop a Safe Support in the Process of Decision Making," Computational Economics 0510002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpco:0510002
    Note: Type of Document - doc; pages: 4

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    expert system; knowledge base; errors; risk;

    JEL classification:

    • C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpco:0510002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.