IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Asset Prices with Rational Beliefs

Listed author(s):
  • Mordecai Kurz
Registered author(s):

    November 28, 1995 (First draft: June 1992) This paper introduces the concept of Rational Belief Equilibrium (RBE) as a basis for a new theory of asset pricing. Rational Beliefs are probability beliefs about future economic variables which cannot be contradicted by the data generated by the economy. RBE is an equilibrium in which the diverse beliefs of all the agents induce an equilibrium stochastic process of prices and quantities and these beliefs are, in general, wrong in the sense that they are different from the true probability of the equilibrium process. These beliefs are, however, Rational. Consequently, in an RBE agents use the wrong forecasting functions and their forecasting mistakes play a crucial role in the analysis. First, we show that these mistakes are the reason why stock returns are explainable in retrospect and forecastable whenever the environment remains unchanged over a long enough time interval for agents to learn the forecasting function. Second, the aggregation of these mistakes generates Endogenous Uncertainty: it is that component of the variability of stock prices and returns which is endogenously induced by the beliefs and actions of the agents rather than by the standard exogenous state variables. The paper develops some basic propositions and empirical implications of the theory of RBE. Based on the historical background of the post world war II era, we formulate an econometric model of stock returns which allows non-stationarity in the form of changing environments ("regimes"). A sequence of econometric hypotheses are then formulated as implications of the theory of RBE and tested utilizing data on common stock returns in the post war period. Apart from confirming the validity of our theory, the empirical analysis shows that (i) common stock returns are forecastable within each environment but it takes time for agents to learn and approximate the forecasting functions. For some agents the time is too short so that it is too late to profit from such learning; (ii) the equilibrium forecasting functions change from one environment to the other in an unforecastable manner so that learning the parameters of one environment does not improve the ability to forecast in the subsequent environments. (iii) more than 2/3 of the variability of stock returns is due to endogenous uncertainty rather than exogenous causes. The paper analyzes one example of a gross market overvaluation which was induced in the 1960's by an aggregation of agent's Mistakes. JEL Classification: D5, E17, G12

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Stanford University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 96003.

    in new window

    Date of creation:
    Handle: RePEc:wop:stanec:96003
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Ralph Landau Economics Building, Stanford, CA 94305-6072

    Phone: (650)-725-3266
    Fax: (650)-725-5702
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:stanec:96003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.