IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/safiwp/99-02-013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Genetic Plasiticity of V Genes Under Somatic Hypermutation: Statistical Analyses Using a New Resampling-Based Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Oprea
  • Thomas B. Kepler

Abstract

Evidence for somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes has been observed in all the species in which immunoglobulins have been found. Previous studies have suggested that codon usage in Ig V genes is such that the sequence-specificity of somatic hypermutation results in greater mutability in complementarity-determining regions of the gene than in the framework regions. We have developed a new resampling-based methodology to explore genetic plasticity in individual V genes and in V gene families in a statistically meaningful way. We determine what factors contribute to this mutability difference, and characterize the strength of selection for this effect. We find that although the codon usage in Ig V genes renders them distinct among translationally equivalent sequences with random codon usage, they are nevertheless far from being optimal in this regard. We find that the mutability patterns in a number of species are similar to those we find for human sequences. Interestingly, sheep sequences show extremely strong mutability differences, consistent with the role of somatic hypermutation as a primary diversification in these animals. Human TCR Vbeta sequences ressemble Ig in mutability pattern, suggesting one of several alternatives: That hypermutation is functionally operating in TCR; that it was once operating in TCR or in the common precursor of TCR and Ig, or that the hypermutation mechanism has evolved to exploit the codon usage in Ig (and fortuitously, TCR) rather than vice versa. Appears in Genome Research9: pp. 1294-1304.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Oprea & Thomas B. Kepler, 1999. "Genetic Plasiticity of V Genes Under Somatic Hypermutation: Statistical Analyses Using a New Resampling-Based Methodology," Working Papers 99-02-013, Santa Fe Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:99-02-013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:99-02-013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epstfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.