Mean-Variance Analysis of the Performance of Spatial Clustering Methods
This paper describes a simulation study investigating the performance of two non-recursive spatial clustering methods---the inverted naive and the spiral methods---in extensive detail and comparing them with the hilbert fractal method that has been shown in previous studies to outperform other recursive clustering methods. The paper highlights the importance of analyzing the sample variance when evaluating the relative performance of various spatial clustering methods. The clustering performance of the methods is examined in terms of both the mean and variance values of the number of clusters (runs of consecutive disk blocks) that must be accessed to retrieve a query region of a given size and orientation. The results show that, for a blocking factor of 1, the mean values for the spiral method are the best, and on average, about 30% better than for the other two methods. In terms of variance, the inverted naive method is the best followed by the spiral and hilbert methods, in that order. We also study the impact of varying query size and the skew ratio (between the X and Y dimensions) for each method. While these performance results do not generalize for higher blocking factors, we beleive that they are useful for both researchers and practitioners to know because several previous studies have also examined this special case, and also because it can arise in some important GIS applications as describe in the paper.
|Date of creation:|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 700 Fisher Hall, 2100 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1144|
Web page: http://fisher.osu.edu/fin/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:ohstfi:_011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.