IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Incentives and Bankruptcy Chapter Choice: Evidence from the Reform Act of 1978

Listed author(s):
  • Ian Domowitz
  • Robert L. Sartain

We ask two related questions relevant to current public policy debates concerning personal bankruptcy: What are the important influences in determining bankruptcy chapter choice, and do new incentives embedded in a major legal change have their anticipated impact? Chapter choice models, differentiated between business-related and nonbusiness bankruptcies, are formulated and estimated with household data gathered both before and after the 1978 Bankruptcy Reform Act. The models predict a substantial portion of the increase in the proportion of reorganizational filings. Testing confirms a shift in behavior across legal regimes, as opposed to explanations based simply on increased eligibility for filing under reorganization or changes in debtor circumstances. Thus, an answer to the incentive question depends upon the identification of the important influences on chapter choice. The sources promoting the increased incidence of reorganizational filings traceable to the law lie in cost effects, differences in categories of dischargeable debt, and increased equity protection under Chapter 13 of the new law. The importance of exemptions on the probability of reorganization decreases under the Code, suggesting that equity incentive effects outweigh disincentives to declare bankruptcy under Chapter 13 due to the more expansive exemptions available. Increased eligibility for business filings in reorganization also plays a role. On the other hand, there are influences relating to debt, which are not directly explainable through the legal changes. We quantify the impact of increases in various sources of debt, and find that unsecured debt, particularly credit card usage, is important, both in explaining chapter choice and in contributing to the rise in reorganizational filings.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University in its series IPR working papers with number 98-7.

in new window

Date of creation:
Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-7
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-4100

Phone: 847-491-8712
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:98-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.