IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Costs and Outcomes of Chiropractic and Physician Care for Work-Related Back Pain

Listed author(s):
  • William G. Johnson
  • Marjorie L. Baldwin
  • Richard J. Butler

This article compares chiropractic and physician treatment of work-related back pain. The costs and outcomes associated with the two different approaches to care are estimated for a sample of approximately 850 California workers who completed an episode of work-related back pain in the years 1991 to 1993. Health care costs are obtained from data on payments to providers and indemnity costs are obtained from data on benefit payments to workers. The outcomes we consider are: the distribution of workers among claim types; the duration of work absences within claim types; and the prevalence of permanent impairments. The results show that chiropractors= patients have shorter average durations of work absence than physicians= patients but, among claims that do not involve permanent impairments, the savings in indemnity costs are more than offset by higher health care costs for chiropractic treatment. Among permanent disability claims, chiropractic treatment generates savings in indemnity and health care costs.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by East Carolina University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 9807.

in new window

Date of creation:
Handle: RePEc:wop:eacaec:9807
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Brewster A-427, 10th Street, Greenville, NC 27858

Phone: (252) 328-6006
Fax: (252) 328-6743
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:eacaec:9807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.